Literature DB >> 16931119

Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.

Omar Kujan1, Ammar Khattab, Richard J Oliver, Stephen A Roberts, Nalin Thakker, Philip Sloan.   

Abstract

The present study attempted to assess the reasons behind the inter-observer variation in grading oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). Three oral pathologists and one general pathologist examined 68 histological slides of OED lesions of variable grade for scoring the presence of each individual characteristic of the architecture and cytology changes that were established by the 2005 WHO classification. The assigned features in each case were correlated with clinical outcomes to understand which features are more commonly associated with malignant transformation. Interestingly, for all individual characteristics, the pairwise inter-examiner and group kappa values ranged from poor to moderate. It appeared that for each characteristic separately there was much dissension. Despite these observations, comparing these data with that from our previous paper on the same slides showed that the inter-observer agreement on the degree of dysplasia either by using the new binary system of "low-risk" or "high-risk" or by using the 2005 WHO classification turned out to be better than the agreement on the individual characteristics of architecture and cytology changes. Certain features show significant association with the clinical outcomes. In the discussion, some explanations to help understanding the sources of variation in grading OED are put forward. In conclusion, grading dysplasia is not an exact science and pathologists are doing their best to reach optimal results. Improvement in the standard of the histopathology reporting of OED lesions could be achieved by consideration of several issues. Of these, there is need for a universal definition of the architectural and cytological features that are the basis of any OED grading process. A minimum dataset for reporting OED lesions should be set up. Also, the use of a consensus scoring process between two or more observers should be encouraged as this would improve inter-observer agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931119     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  46 in total

Review 1.  Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Premalignancy.

Authors:  Sook-Bin Woo
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2019-03-18

2.  [Endoscopy of the larynx by hyperspectral imaging].

Authors:  A O H Gerstner; W Laffers; G Schade; F Göke; R Martin; B Thies
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Current views and perspectives on classification of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the head and neck.

Authors:  Nina Gale; Nina Zidar; Mario Poljak; Antonio Cardesa
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2014-03-05

4.  Lung cancer diagnosis from proteomic analysis of preinvasive lesions.

Authors:  S M Jamshedur Rahman; Adriana L Gonzalez; Ming Li; Erin H Seeley; Lisa J Zimmerman; Xueqiong J Zhang; M Lisa Manier; Sandra J Olson; Ronak N Shah; Alison N Miller; Joe B Putnam; York E Miller; Wilbur A Franklin; William J Blot; David P Carbone; Yu Shyr; Richard M Caprioli; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Oral cancer detection: A digital diagnostic test for oral cancer.

Authors:  J-Y S Yeung
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 6.  Prognostic factors, predictive markers and cancer biology: the triad for successful oral cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Jose Augusto Monteiro de Oliveira Novaes; William N William
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Dysplasia at the margin? Investigating the case for subsequent therapy in 'low-risk' squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.

Authors:  Dennis M Sopka; Tianyu Li; Miriam N Lango; Ranee Mehra; Jeffrey Chang-Jen Liu; Barbara Burtness; Douglas B Flieder; John A Ridge; Thomas J Galloway
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Oral premalignant lesions: from the pathological viewpoint.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Izumo
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Potential use of quantitative tissue phenotype to predict malignant risk for oral premalignant lesions.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Lewei Zhang; Catherine Poh; Miriam P Rosin; Calum MacAulay
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  MAGE-A as a novel approach in the diagnostic accuracy of oral squamous cell cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Nur Mollaoglu; Stephan Schwarz; Friedrich W Neukam; Emeka Nkenke; Jutta Ries
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.