Literature DB >> 16930990

Failure of dietetic referral in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and weight loss.

C Baldwin1, C McGough, A R Norman, G S Frost, D C Cunningham, H J N Andreyev.   

Abstract

This study examined whether staff working within a cancer centre treating patients with gastrointestinal malignancy routinely identified individuals from outpatients for referral to a dietitian. A nutrition screening tool is employed only for in-patient admissions. Height, current and usual weight were recorded prospectively in all patients referred for consideration of treatment. First appointment with the dietitian, first hospital admission, demographic and clinical details were obtained from hospital records. Time from first appointment to referral to a dietitian was examined. Between September 2002 and March 2004, 920 patients were included. Five hundred and seventeen patients had lost weight, of whom 223 patients had lost between 5% and 10% and 294 patients had lost more than 10% of their pre-morbid weight. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients (36%) were referred to dietitians. Twenty eight (9%) of referrals were made by staff in outpatients. Two hundred and ninety-nine were referred during or after an inpatient admission but only 39% of these occurred within the first seven days following admission. One third of patients with more than 10% weight loss were not referred for dietary assessment, even following admission. The likelihood of referral was significantly associated with the degree of weight loss (univariate analysis hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.4-2.19, multivariate HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22-2.23) and was independent of factors such as performance status and clinical setting. Few patients were identified early in their treatment for referral to a dietitian. Since most chemotherapy is now given on an outpatient basis, patients are unlikely to be referred if they do not require admission. This study suggests that an out-patient dietetic screening tool is urgently required. Such screening is likely to result in considerable improvements to the clinical care of cancer patients with weight loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16930990     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  10 in total

1.  NICE guidance for screening for malnutrition: implications for lung cancer services.

Authors:  Alpna Chauhan; Vanessa Siddall; Andrew Wilcock; Sugamya Mallawathantri; David R Baldwin; Ian D Johnston
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Late referral of cancer patients with malnutrition to dietitians: a prospective study of clinical practice.

Authors:  Cliona M Lorton; O Griffin; K Higgins; F Roulston; G Stewart; N Gough; E Barnes; A Aktas; T D Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Treatment for unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer: current evidence and trends.

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Frank P Vleggaar; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Potential benefits of early nutritional intervention in adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a pilot randomised trial.

Authors:  Mary Anne Silvers; June Savva; Catherine E Huggins; Helen Truby; Terry Haines
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Weight Changes in Black and White Women Receiving Chemotherapy Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Chiranjeev Dash; Bridget Oppong; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol Res       Date:  2015-03-12

6.  Nutritional support and risk status among cancer patients in palliative home care services.

Authors:  Y Orrevall; C Tishelman; J Permert; T Cederholm
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Practice guidance on the management of acute and chronic gastrointestinal problems arising as a result of treatment for cancer.

Authors:  H Jervoise N Andreyev; Susan E Davidson; Catherine Gillespie; William H Allum; Edwin Swarbrick
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Effect of early and intensive nutrition care, delivered via telephone or mobile application, on quality of life in people with upper gastrointestinal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lauren Hanna; Catherine E Huggins; Kate Furness; Mary Anne Silvers; June Savva; Helena Frawley; Daniel Croagh; Paul Cashin; Liang Low; Judith Bauer; Helen Truby; Terrence Haines
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Nutritional Outcomes of patients Undergoing Resection for upper gastroIntestinal cancer in AuStralian Hospitals (NOURISH): protocol for a multicentre point prevalence study.

Authors:  Irene Deftereos; Justin M C Yeung; Vanessa M Carter; Elizabeth Isenring; Nicole K Kiss
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Effect of Early and Intensive Telephone or Electronic Nutrition Counselling Delivered to People with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer on Quality of Life: A Three-Arm Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Catherine E Huggins; Lauren Hanna; Kate Furness; Mary Anne Silvers; June Savva; Helena Frawley; Daniel Croagh; Paul Cashin; Liang Low; Judy Bauer; Helen Truby; Terry P Haines
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 6.706

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.