Literature DB >> 16930752

Planning organ at risk volume margins for organ motion of the intestine.

Liv Bolstad Hysing1, Yngve Kvinnsland, Hannah Lord, Ludvig Paul Muren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To account for internal organ motion and set-up uncertainties around organs at risk (OR) in radiotherapy (RT), the ICRU report no 62 introduced the planning organ at risk volume (PRV). In the present study, we have quantified PRV margins for the intestine, which is an important OR in pelvic RT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was based on intestine contours outlined in a total of 149 CT scans of 20 male bladder cancer patients (20 planning scans, 129 during treatment). From these data, we created location probability maps of the intestine for each patient. A commercial treatment planning system was used to add 3D isotropic intestine PRV margins (from 5 to 30 mm, in intervals of 5 mm) around the intestine planning outline. We then derived the fraction of patients for which a given PRV encompassed various degrees of intestine motion (85%, 90% and 95% of volumes with different probabilities of intestinal occupancy). As a measure of the specificity of the PRV, we also derived the fraction of the PRV containing volumes with zero probability of intestinal occupancy.
RESULTS: Isotropic margins of up to 30 mm are required to account for all intestine motion in 90% of the patients, while isotropic margins of 5 - 10 mm will encompass 85 - 95% of the volumes having a probability of intestinal occupancy of > or = 75% in the same fraction of patients. Intestine PRVs are not very specific and will also include volumes where the intestine will rarely or never be located.
CONCLUSIONS: Large intestinal motion was found, but isotropic PRV margins of 5-10 mm will include the major part of volumes with a large probability of intestinal occupancy in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16930752     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Target Volume and Organ at Risk Contour Delineation Agreement Among NRG Sarcoma Radiation Oncologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Baldini; Ross A Abrams; Walter Bosch; David Roberge; Rick L M Haas; Charles N Catton; Daniel J Indelicato; Jeffrey R Olsen; Curtiland Deville; Yen-Lin Chen; Steven E Finkelstein; Thomas F DeLaney; Dian Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Statistical simulations to estimate motion-inclusive dose-volume histograms for prediction of rectal morbidity following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditya Apte; Joseph O Deasy; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Modeling intra-fractional abdominal configuration changes using breathing motion-corrected radial MRI.

Authors:  Lianli Liu; Adam Johansson; Yue Cao; Rojano Kashani; Theodore S Lawrence; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Impact of prone versus supine positioning on small bowel dose with pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Victor J Gonzalez; Craig R Hullett; Lindsay Burt; Prema Rassiah-Szegedi; Vikren Sarkar; Jonathan D Tward; Lisa J Hazard; Y Jessica Huang; Bill J Salter; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-24

5.  Dose-volume analysis of predictors for chronic gastrointestinal complications in patients with cervical cancer treated with postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and whole-pelvic radiation therapy.

Authors:  Fumiaki Isohashi; Seiji Mabuchi; Yuichi Akino; Yasuo Yoshioka; Yuji Seo; Osamu Suzuki; Keisuke Tamari; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Kenjiro Sawada; Yutaka Ueda; Eiji Kobayashi; Iori Sumida; Hirokazu Mizuno; Hirofumi Okubo; Tadashi Kimura; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.724

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.