Literature DB >> 16929479

Do personal and societal preferences differ by socio-demographic group?

Peter Franks1, Erica I Lubetkin, Joy Melnikow.   

Abstract

For equity, preferences used in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) should yield similar values for different groups with similar health states. We used data from the US 2000 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, including socio-demographics, EQ-5D Index and EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS) scores, to examine whether EQ-5D Index (representing community preferences) and EQ VAS (representing personal preferences) scores differed systematically by socio-demographic group. Differences between EQ-5D Index and EQ VAS scores by socio-demographic group were small and mostly not statistically significant. These preliminary findings suggest that using the EQ-5D Index in CEAs may not contribute to socio-demographic inequities. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16929479     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  7 in total

1.  Valuing health in a racially and ethnically diverse community sample: an analysis using the valuation metrics of money and time.

Authors:  Norah E Mulvaney-Day; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Chih-Nan Chen; Mara Laderman; Margarita Alegría
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Differences between individual and societal health state valuations: any link with personality?

Authors:  Benjamin P Chapman; Peter Franks; Paul R Duberstein; Anthony Jerant
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: inequalities among adults with a chronic disease.

Authors:  Andreas Mielck; Martin Vogelmann; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  A note on the relationship between age and health-related quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Patricia Cubi-Molla; Koonal Shah; Jamie Garside; Mike Herdman; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Do socio-demographic characteristics and/or health status explain the magnitude of differences between patient and general public utility values? A chronic low back pain patients case study.

Authors:  J M van Dongen; M L van Hooff; A P Finch; M W van Tulder; J E Bosmans; R W J G Ostelo; M de Kleuver
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores.

Authors:  David K Whynes
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Why equal treatment is not always equitable: the impact of existing ethnic health inequalities in cost-effectiveness modeling.

Authors:  Melissa McLeod; Tony Blakely; Giorgi Kvizhinadze; Ricci Harris
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2014-06-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.