Literature DB >> 16929447

Functional outcome of surgical treatment for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.

Panagiotis Zouboulis1, Zouboulis E Panagiotis, Athanasios Karageorgos, Karageorgos Athanasios, Panagiotis Dimakopoulos, Dimakopoulos Panagiotis, Minos Tyllianakis, Tyllianakis Minos, Charis Matzaroglou, Matzaroglou Charis, Elias Lambiris, Lambiris Elias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the best treatment of patients with multilevel lumbar stenosis. We evaluated the clinical and radiological findings in 41 patients with complex degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine who were treated surgically.
METHODS: Between 1997 and 2003, 41 patients suffering from degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were included in a prospective clinical study. The spinal stenosis was multilevel in all patients and in 13 of them there was degenerative scoliosis, in 18 there was degenerative spondylolisthesis, and in 10 there was segmental instability. Plain radiographs, MRI and/or CT myelograms were obtained preoperatively. The patients were assessed clinically with the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS). Surgery included wide posterior decompression and fusion using a trans-pedicular instrumentation system and bone graft.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 3.7 (1-6) years, the patients' clinical improvement on the ODI and VAS was statistically significant. Recurrent stenosis was not observed, and 39 of 41 patients were satisfied with the outcome. 3 patients with improvement initially had later surgery because of instability.
INTERPRETATION: The above-mentioned technique gives good and long lasting clinical results, when selection of patients is done carefully and when the spinal levels that are to be decompressed are selected accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16929447     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610012773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  5 in total

Review 1.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.

Authors:  Mustafa Sirvanci; Mona Bhatia; Kursat Ali Ganiyusufoglu; Cihan Duran; Mehmet Tezer; Cagatay Ozturk; Mehmet Aydogan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Marc Röllinghoff; Klaus Schlüter-Brust; Daniel Groos; Rolf Sobottke; Joern William-Patrick Michael; Peer Eysel; Karl Stefan Delank
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2010-03-20

4.  Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systems.

Authors:  Yeon-Jee Ko; Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Chi Young Park; Jungheum Cho; Yusuhn Kang; Joong Mo Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Treatment of multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis using a combination of microendoscopic discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Han Wu; Wei-Dong Yu; Rui Jiang; Zhong-Li Gao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.