Literature DB >> 16929245

Faecal bacterial mass and energetic losses in healthy humans and patients with a short bowel syndrome.

L Achour1, S Nancey, D Moussata, I Graber, B Messing, B Flourié.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In addition to non-digested nutrients, human stools contain endogenous substrates, among which bacteria are a major component, whose growth may be stimulated when more dietary nutrients are available for bacterial fermentation, as in patients with malabsorption syndrome. We assessed the energy content and composition of both stools and faecal bacteria in healthy volunteers and patients with a short bowel and colon in continuity (SBC). Our goal was to clarify the magnitude of error introduced by the faecal bacteria in the measurement of the digestibility of ingested energy and nutrients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied six healthy volunteers and six patients with a SBC under free oral intake. The bacterial mass of stools was isolated. In the bacterial fractions and fresh stools, calorie, fat, nitrogen and short-chain fatty acid contents were determined. The Wilcoxon signed rank or the Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison.
RESULTS: In healthy volunteers and patients with SBC, faecal bacterial mass accounted for 44 and 35% of faecal dry weight, and contained 50 and 34% of total faecal energy. In healthy volunteers, the apparent digestibilities when corrected by bacterial constituents (88-97% according to nutrients) were significantly higher than the apparent non-corrected digestibilities (84-94%). In patients with SBC, the corrected apparent digestibilities (69-89% according to nutrients) were significantly higher than the apparent non-corrected digestibilities (54-83%).
CONCLUSION: The error introduced by the faecal bacterial fraction when assessing the extent of nutrient digestibility is small in healthy volunteers; it is more pronounced in patients with SBC, reaching 18% for the digestibility of ingested fat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16929245     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the effects of the intestinal microbiota on selected nutrients and non-nutrients.

Authors:  Colette Shortt; Oliver Hasselwander; Alexandra Meynier; Arjen Nauta; Estefanía Noriega Fernández; Peter Putz; Ian Rowland; Jonathan Swann; Jessica Türk; Joan Vermeiren; Jean-Michel Antoine
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Effects of Dietary Cereal and Protein Source on Fiber Digestibility, Composition, and Metabolic Activity of the Intestinal Microbiota in Weaner Piglets.

Authors:  Carola Ellner; Anna G Wessels; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Gut microbiota and voluntary alcohol consumption.

Authors:  L Segovia-Rodríguez; V Echeverry-Alzate; I Rincón-Pérez; J Calleja-Conde; K M Bühler; E Giné; J Albert; J A Hinojosa; E Huertas; F Gómez-Gallego; C Bressa; F Rodríguez de Fonseca; J A López-Moreno
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.989

4.  Faecal D/L lactate ratio is a metabolic signature of microbiota imbalance in patients with short bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Camille Mayeur; Jean-Jacques Gratadoux; Chantal Bridonneau; Fatima Chegdani; Béatrice Larroque; Nathalie Kapel; Olivier Corcos; Muriel Thomas; Francisca Joly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology.

Authors:  C Rose; A Parker; B Jefferson; E Cartmell
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 12.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.