Literature DB >> 16929040

From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among health care professionals.

Jan-Tore Lium1, Hallvard Laerum, Tom Schulz, Arild Faxvaag.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many Norwegian hospitals that are equipped with an electronic medical record (EMR) system now have proceeded to withdraw the paper-based medical record from clinical workflow. In two previous survey-based studies on the effect of removing the paper-based medical record on the work of physicians, nurses and medical secretaries, we concluded that to scan and eliminate the paper based record was feasible, but that the medical secretaries were the group that reported to benefit the most from the change. To further explore the effects of removing the paper based record, especially in regard to medical personnel, we now have conducted a follow up study of a hospital that has scanned and eliminated its paper-based record.
DESIGN: A survey of 27 physicians, 60 nurses and 30 medical secretaries was conducted. The results were compared with those from a previous study conducted three years earlier at the same department. MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire (see online Appendix) covered the frequency of use of the EMR system for specific tasks by physicians, nurses and medical secretaries, the ease of performing these tasks compared to previous routines, user satisfaction and computer literacy.
RESULTS: Both physicians and nurses displayed increased use of the EMR compared to the previous study, while medical secretaries reported generally unchanged but high use.
CONCLUSION: The increase in use was not accompanied by a similar change in factors such as computer literacy or technical changes, suggesting that these typical success factors are necessary but not sufficient.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16929040      PMCID: PMC1656958          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  23 in total

1.  Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations.

Authors:  G Southon; C Sauer; K Dampney
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Paul N Gorman; Veena Seshadri; William R Hersh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.

Authors:  Hallvard Laerum; Tom H Karlsen; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Don E Detmer; Donald Simborg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lise Poissant; Jennifer Pereira; Robyn Tamblyn; Yuko Kawasumi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context.

Authors:  M Berg; C Langenberg; I vd Berg; J Kwakkernaat
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach.

Authors:  M Berg
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 8.  Health information systems - past, present, future.

Authors:  Reinhold Haux
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians.

Authors:  Hallvard Laerum; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.

Authors:  Hallvard Laerum; Tom H Karlsen; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  9 in total

1.  Diffusion of Electronic Health Records and electronic communication in Norway.

Authors:  V Heimly; A Grimsmo; A Faxvaag
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carrie Anna McGinn; Sonya Grenier; Julie Duplantie; Nicola Shaw; Claude Sicotte; Luc Mathieu; Yvan Leduc; France Légaré; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Quality of human-computer interaction--results of a national usability survey of hospital-IT in Germany.

Authors:  Bettina B Bundschuh; Raphael W Majeed; Thomas Bürkle; Klaus Kuhn; Ulrich Sax; Christof Seggewies; Cornelia Vosseler; Rainer Röhrig
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Measuring the operational impact of digitized hospital records: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Philip J Scott; Paul J Curley; Paul B Williams; Ian P Linehan; Steven H Shaha
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Identifying and adapting interventions to reduce documentation burden and improve nurses' efficiency in using electronic health record systems (The IDEA Study): protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Gillian Strudwick; Lianne Jeffs; Jessica Kemp; Lydia Sequeira; Brian Lo; Nelson Shen; Petroiya Paterson; Noelle Coombe; Lily Yang; Kara Ronald; Wei Wang; Sonia Pagliaroli; Tania Tajirian; Sara Ling; Damian Jankowicz
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Progress along developmental tracks for electronic health records implementation in the United States.

Authors:  David W Hollar
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-03-16

7.  HIS-based electronic documentation can significantly reduce the time from biopsy to final report for prostate tumours and supports quality management as well as clinical research.

Authors:  Bernhard Breil; Axel Semjonow; Martin Dugas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.

Authors:  Jan-Tore Lium; Aksel Tjora; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Physicians' perception and attitude toward electronic medical record.

Authors:  Parvin Lakbala; Kavoos Dindarloo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-02-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.