Literature DB >> 16929020

Effect of Doppler angle in diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Muharrem Tola1, Mehmet Yurdakul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare velocity measurements obtained with 2 fixed insonation angles and to investigate whether there is a difference in their ability in determining internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.
METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with ICA stenosis were examined with color duplex ultrasonography. Velocity measurements were made at 60 degrees and 45 degrees insonation angles, and they were compared with Bland-Altman and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity measurements obtained at the 60 degrees insonation angle were higher compared with those obtained at the 45 degrees insonation angle (24.2% and 24.7%, respectively). The ICA-to-common carotid artery PSV ratio, conversely, was slightly higher (3.9%). Although the threshold values for the same velocity parameters obtained at 2 different insonation angles were different, the accuracy ratios (sensitivity and specificity) were not. With application of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus criteria to the data obtained at either of the 2 insonation angles, the accuracy ratios of PSV and end-diastolic velocity were found to be statistically different. In the ICA-to-common carotid artery PSV ratio, however, there were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy ratios.
CONCLUSIONS: Doppler velocity measurements made at different fixed insonation angles show considerable differences. In determining ICA stenosis, although optimal thresholds are different, the diagnostic performance is not different. In determining ICA stenosis with color duplex ultrasonography, angle-specific thresholds must be determined, and examinations must be made at a fixed angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16929020     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.9.1187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  7 in total

1.  Tips for carotid ultrasound in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Issac Cheong; Milton Bermeo; Guido Granberg; Francisco Marcelo Tamagnone
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 2.  Ultrasound diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis and occlusion.

Authors:  Hidehiro Takekawa; Daisuke Tsukui; Saro Kobayasi; Keisuke Suzuki; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 3.  Altered Doppler flow patterns in cirrhosis patients: an overview.

Authors:  Pooya Iranpour; Chandana Lall; Roozbeh Houshyar; Mohammad Helmy; Albert Yang; Joon-Il Choi; Garrett Ward; Scott C Goodwin
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-05-27

4.  Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements.

Authors:  Irene W Y Ma; Joshua D Caplin; Aftab Azad; Christina Wilson; Michael A Fifer; Aranya Bagchi; Andrew S Liteplo; Vicki E Noble
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 5.  Standards of the Polish Ultrasound Society - update. Examination of extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries.

Authors:  Michał Elwertowski; Grzegorz Małek
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2014-06-30

6.  Optimization of beam-flow angles for Doppler ultrasound flow velocity measurements using slanted gel pads.

Authors:  Michael Yong Park; Seung Eun Jung; Joon-Il Choi; Jae Young Byun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-15

Review 7.  Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis?

Authors:  Victor J Del Brutto; Heather L Gornik; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.