Literature DB >> 16928938

MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.

Saroja Adusumilli1, Hero K Hussain, Elaine M Caoili, William J Weadock, John P Murray, Timothy D Johnson, Qixuan Chen, Benoit Desjardins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of MRI to characterize sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses and to define the sonographic features contributing to indeterminate diagnoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two blinded radiologists retrospectively reviewed the MRI examinations of 87 patients with 95 sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Reviewers determined the origin of a mass, its tissue content (cystic, solid, complex cystic, or cystic and solid), tissue characteristics (fat, blood, fibrous, or leiomyomatous), and benignity versus malignancy. Sonograms were reviewed by three reviewers to determine the origin of a mass, its tissue content, and reasons for an indeterminate diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated, and agreement of sonography and MRI with the final diagnosis was determined using kappa statistics. The final diagnosis was determined by histopathology, surgical findings, or imaging or clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI for identifying malignancy (n = 5) was 100% and its specificity for benignity (n = 90) was 94%. Excellent agreement was seen between MRI and the final diagnosis for determining the origin (kappa = 0.93), tissue content (kappa = 0.98), and tissue characteristics (kappa = 0.91) of a mass. Sonography had poor agreement with the final diagnosis for the origin (kappa = 0.19) and tissue content (kappa = 0.33) of a mass. The main reasons for indeterminate sonographic diagnoses were the inability to determine origin because of location and large mass size and the appearances of purely solid or complex cystic masses.
CONCLUSION: Sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses of uncertain origin and solid or complex cystic content benefit from further evaluation with MRI, which is highly accurate for identifying the origin of a mass and characterizing its tissue content, obviating surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16928938     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  26 in total

1.  Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions.

Authors:  Bianka Chilla; Nik Hauser; Gad Singer; Mafalda Trippel; Johannes M Froehlich; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Value of MRI in Characterizing Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Alpana Karnik; Raina Anil Tembey; Sanjeev Mani
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-09

3.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.

Authors:  A C Tsili; C Tsampoulas; M Argyropoulou; I Navrozoglou; Y Alamanos; E Paraskevaidis; S C Efremidis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging and genomics of granulosa cell tumors.

Authors:  Sherif Elsherif; Matthew Bourne; Erik Soule; Chandana Lall; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

Review 6.  Mucinous Neoplasms of the Ovary: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.

Authors:  Jamie Marko; Kathryn I Marko; Suvidya L Pachigolla; Barbara A Crothers; Rubina Mattu; Darcy J Wolfman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  [Radiological diagnostics of ovarian cancer].

Authors:  M Meissnitzer; R Forstner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Multimodality imaging of ovarian cystic lesions: Review with an imaging based algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Ashish P Wasnik; Christine O Menias; Joel F Platt; Usha R Lalchandani; Deepak G Bedi; Khaled M Elsayes
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses.

Authors:  Alessandro Marro; Lisa M Allen; Sari L Kives; Rahim Moineddin; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-20

10.  ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach.

Authors:  John A Spencer; Rosmarie Forstner; Teresa M Cunha; Karen Kinkel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.