Literature DB >> 16928505

Clinical outcomes of noninfectious sternal dehiscence after median sternotomy.

Vanessa A Olbrecht1, Christopher J Barreiro, Pramod N Bonde, Jason A Williams, William A Baumgartner, Vincent L Gott, John V Conte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications of median sternotomy carry significant morbidity and mortality. However, the outcomes of noninfectious sternal dehiscence have not been addressed. We have identified the preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and long-term functional outcomes of patients after reoperation for noninfectious sternal dehiscence and compared these patients with a control group to determine risk factors for dehiscence.
METHODS: Retrospective review of the cardiac surgery database identified 48 patients with noninfectious sternal dehiscence in a group of 12,380 median sternotomies between 1994 and 2004. The review included diagnosis, demographics, concomitant medical conditions, and surgical outcomes. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Short Form-12 questionnaire. One hundred fifty-six median sternotomy patients served as controls. Follow-up was 97.9% (47 of 48 patients) complete, for a total of 150.1 patient-years.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients at reoperation was 58.8 +/- 12.8 years, with a male to female ratio of 45:3. Multivariate analysis determined that New York Heart Association class IV, obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were preoperative risk factors for sternal dehiscence. The incidence of sternal dehiscence was 0.39% at a mean interval between initial operation and reoperation of 5.4 months. At a mean interval of 3.9 months, 14.6% (7 of 48) of patients required additional sternal procedures. Infectious complications after reoperation occurred in 12.5% (6 of 48). Functional outcomes demonstrated that 72.2% (26 of 36) had no or mild limitation of physical activities, with 90.5% (38 of 42) reporting no or mild sternal pain at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients undergoing surgical correction of noninfectious sternal dehiscence fare better than those with infectious complications, optimal sternal approximation during the initial procedure and sternal precautions during convalescence should be emphasized to prevent recurrent complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16928505     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  30 in total

1.  Overview and management of sternal wound infection.

Authors:  Kimberly Singh; Erica Anderson; J Garrett Harper
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  [Aortocoronary bypass and cardiac valve surgery].

Authors:  D Fischer; H Drexler
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  The effects of LED emissions on sternotomy incision repair after myocardial revascularization: a randomized double-blind study with follow-up.

Authors:  Rauirys Alencar de Oliveira; Gilderlene Alves Fernandes; Andréa Conceição Gomes Lima; Antônio Dib Tajra Filho; Raimundo de Barros Araújo; Renata Amadei Nicolau
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Sternal Precautions: Is It Time for Change? Precautions versus Restrictions - A Review of Literature and Recommendations for Revision.

Authors:  Lawrence P Cahalin; Tanya Kinney Lapier; Donald K Shaw
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2011-03

5.  Does the number of wires used to close a sternotomy have an impact on deep sternal wound infection?

Authors:  Kasra Shaikhrezai; Faye L Robertson; Susan E Anderson; Robert D Slight; Edward T Brackenbury
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-18

6.  Late complications of chest wall reconstruction: management of painful sternal nonunion.

Authors:  Kyle J Chepla; Christopher J Salgado; Cathy J Tang; Samir Mardini; Karen K Evans
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  A new cable-tie-based sternal closure device: infectious considerations.

Authors:  Ludovic Melly; Brigitta Gahl; Ruth Meinke; Florian Rueter; Peter Matt; Oliver Reuthebuch; Friedrich S Eckstein; Martin T R Grapow
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-26

8.  Supportive treatment using a compression garment vest of painful sternal instability following deep surgical wound infection: a case report.

Authors:  Andreas Klement; Manfred Herrmann
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-08-11

9.  Sternal closure after median sternotomy: a new technique using titanium hooks and wires applied parasternally.

Authors:  Eckehard Kilian; Helmut Mair; Bruno Reichart; Peter Lamm
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Wound complications after median sternotomy: a single-centre study.

Authors:  Claudia Heilmann; Rahel Stahl; Christian Schneider; Tetyana Sukhodolya; Matthias Siepe; Manfred Olschewski; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.