Hillary R Bogner1, Julia Y Lin, Knashawn H Morales. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA. hillary.bogner@uphs.upenn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the personal characteristics associated with different patterns of adherence to the antidepressant citalopram in a primary care trial of depression management. METHOD: The study sample consisted of 228 adults aged 60 years and older recruited from primary care settings and who participated in a depression intervention. The intervention consisted of services of trained care managers, who offered recommendations to physicians following a clinical algorithm and helped patients with treatment adherence. Adherence to the antidepressant citalopram was measured using pill counts. We employed the latent class model to classify patients according to the pattern of adherence to citalopram over time. We examined the association of sociodemographic characteristics, depression status, cognitive status, and medical comorbidity with the resulting classes of adherence. RESULTS: The latent class model generated three classes of adherence: known to be adherent, unknown adherence, and known to be nonadherent. Participants who were white were more likely to be in the known to be adherent class than in the known to be nonadherent class (odds ratio (OR) = 10.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.47, 31.12]). Married participants were less likely to be in the unknown adherence class than the known to be nonadherent class (OR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.09, 0.85]). No associations between age, gender, education level, depression status, cognitive status, or medical comorbidity and classes of adherence were found. CONCLUSIONS: We found stronger relationships between ethnicity and marital status with patterns of adherence to citalopram than we did other personal characteristics. Identification of a subgroup of patients at particularly high risk of nonadherence is important for the development of adherence interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the personal characteristics associated with different patterns of adherence to the antidepressant citalopram in a primary care trial of depression management. METHOD: The study sample consisted of 228 adults aged 60 years and older recruited from primary care settings and who participated in a depression intervention. The intervention consisted of services of trained care managers, who offered recommendations to physicians following a clinical algorithm and helped patients with treatment adherence. Adherence to the antidepressant citalopram was measured using pill counts. We employed the latent class model to classify patients according to the pattern of adherence to citalopram over time. We examined the association of sociodemographic characteristics, depression status, cognitive status, and medical comorbidity with the resulting classes of adherence. RESULTS: The latent class model generated three classes of adherence: known to be adherent, unknown adherence, and known to be nonadherent. Participants who were white were more likely to be in the known to be adherent class than in the known to be nonadherent class (odds ratio (OR) = 10.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.47, 31.12]). Married participants were less likely to be in the unknown adherence class than the known to be nonadherent class (OR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.09, 0.85]). No associations between age, gender, education level, depression status, cognitive status, or medical comorbidity and classes of adherence were found. CONCLUSIONS: We found stronger relationships between ethnicity and marital status with patterns of adherence to citalopram than we did other personal characteristics. Identification of a subgroup of patients at particularly high risk of nonadherence is important for the development of adherence interventions.
Authors: B H Mulsant; G S Alexopoulos; C F Reynolds; I R Katz; R Abrams; D Oslin; H C Schulberg Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: T W Croghan; T J Lair; L Engelhart; W E Crown; C Copley-Merriman; C A Melfi; R L Obenchain; D P Buesching Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: M E Garay-Sevilla; L E Nava; J M Malacara; R Huerta; J Díaz de León; A Mena; M E Fajardo Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 1995 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Thomas R Ten Have; Charles F Reynolds; Ira I Katz; Herbert C Schulberg; Benoit H Mulsant; Gregory K Brown; Gail J McAvay; Jane L Pearson; George S Alexopoulos Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hyacinth N Uzoma; Gloria M Reeves; Patricia Langenberg; Baharak Khabazghazvini; Theodora G Balis; Mary A Johnson; Aamar Sleemi; Debra A Scrandis; Sarah A Zimmerman; Dipika Vaswani; Gagan Virk Nijjar; Johanna Cabassa; Manana Lapidus; Kelly J Rohan; Teodor T Postolache Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2015-03-22
Authors: Helen C Kales; Donald E Nease; Jo Anne Sirey; Kara Zivin; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Janet Kavanagh; Shana Lynn; Claire Chiang; Harold W Neighbors; Marcia Valenstein; Frederic C Blow Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.105