Literature DB >> 16927451

A deficiency of the odds ratio as a measure of effect size.

Robert G Newcombe1.   

Abstract

The odds ratio is probably the most widely used measure of association for binary variables. It has many well-recognized advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis the risk ratio. We demonstrate that for chained or conditional probabilities, odds ratios can behave paradoxically, by failing to show a reinforcement effect that is expressed very clearly when risk ratios are used. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16927451     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

Review 1.  How to assess the clinical impact of treatments on patients, rather than the statistical impact of treatments on measures.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer; Ellen Frank; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Determining gene moderation of environmental risk factors for a mental disorder: a "perfect storm" of methodological problems.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Detecting moderator effects using subgroup analyses.

Authors:  Rui Wang; James H Ware
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-04

4.  Epidemiological methods: about time.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A dimensional versus a categorical approach to diagnosis: anxiety and depression in the HUNT 2 study.

Authors:  Ingvar Bjelland; Stein A Lie; Alv A Dahl; Arnstein Mykletun; Eystein Stordal; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  A general binomial regression model to estimate standardized risk differences from binary response data.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kovalchik; Ravi Varadhan; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Sholom Wacholder; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio "portable" in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model.

Authors:  Mengli Xiao; Yong Chen; Stephen R Cole; Richard F MacLehose; David B Richardson; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Friendships in Integrative Settings: Network Analyses in Organized Sports and a Comparison with School.

Authors:  Alexander Steiger; Fabian Mumenthaler; Siegfried Nagel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Estimating adjusted prevalence ratio in clustered cross-sectional epidemiological data.

Authors:  Carlos Antônio S T Santos; Rosemeire L Fiaccone; Nelson F Oliveira; Sérgio Cunha; Maurício L Barreto; Maria Beatriz B do Carmo; Ana-Lucia Moncayo; Laura C Rodrigues; Philip J Cooper; Leila D Amorim
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.