CONTEXT: Once-daily HIV treatment regimens are being used in clinical practice with the objective of improving patient acceptance and adherence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of saquinavir-soft-gelatin capsule (SGC)/ritonavir combination (1600 mg/100 mg) vs efavirenz (600 mg) both once daily and combined with 2 nucleoside analogs twice daily. SETTING:Twenty-six centers in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. PATIENTS: A total of 171 antiretroviral naive HIV-infected individuals were enrolled in a 48-week, phase 3, open-label, randomized study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA levels < 50 copies/mL. The pharmacokinetic profile of saquinavir-SGC was analyzed in a subset of randomly selected patients. RESULTS: In the primary intent-to-treat population at week 48, 51% (38/75) and 71% (55/77) of patients in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, achieved HIV-RNA suppression < 50 copies/mL (P = .5392, 95% 1-sided confidence interval [CI] = -33.5%). In the on-treatment (OT) population, 73% (38/52) and 93% (54/58) of patients in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, had effective viral suppression < 50 copies/mL (P = .5015, 95% 1-sided CI = -33.4%). Mean CD4+ cell counts increased by 239 and 204 cells/microliters (mcL), in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, in the OT analysis (P = .058). Both regimens were reasonably well tolerated, although more gastrointestinal adverse events were reported with saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir. Pharmacokinetic profiles in 6 patients showed an observed median Cmin at 24 hours of 429 ng/mL (range, 68-1750 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily efavirenz was statistically superior to once-daily saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were commonly associated with treatment failure in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir arm of the study.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Once-daily HIV treatment regimens are being used in clinical practice with the objective of improving patient acceptance and adherence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of saquinavir-soft-gelatin capsule (SGC)/ritonavir combination (1600 mg/100 mg) vs efavirenz (600 mg) both once daily and combined with 2 nucleoside analogs twice daily. SETTING: Twenty-six centers in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. PATIENTS: A total of 171 antiretroviral naive HIV-infected individuals were enrolled in a 48-week, phase 3, open-label, randomized study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA levels < 50 copies/mL. The pharmacokinetic profile of saquinavir-SGC was analyzed in a subset of randomly selected patients. RESULTS: In the primary intent-to-treat population at week 48, 51% (38/75) and 71% (55/77) of patients in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, achieved HIV-RNA suppression < 50 copies/mL (P = .5392, 95% 1-sided confidence interval [CI] = -33.5%). In the on-treatment (OT) population, 73% (38/52) and 93% (54/58) of patients in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, had effective viral suppression < 50 copies/mL (P = .5015, 95% 1-sided CI = -33.4%). Mean CD4+ cell counts increased by 239 and 204 cells/microliters (mcL), in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, in the OT analysis (P = .058). Both regimens were reasonably well tolerated, although more gastrointestinal adverse events were reported with saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir. Pharmacokinetic profiles in 6 patients showed an observed median Cmin at 24 hours of 429 ng/mL (range, 68-1750 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily efavirenz was statistically superior to once-daily saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were commonly associated with treatment failure in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir arm of the study.
Authors: J Durant; P Clevenbergh; R Garraffo; P Halfon; S Icard; P Del Giudice; N Montagne; J M Schapiro; P Dellamonica Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-07-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Peter G Cardiello; Rolf P van Heeswijk; Elly A Hassink; Preeyaporn Srasuebkul; Apicha Mahanontharit; Tarika M Samor; Wassana Worarien; Jos H Beijnen; Richard M Hoetelmans; Kiat Ruxrungtham; David A Cooper; Joep M Lange; Praphan Phanuphak Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: A d'Arminio Monforte; A C Lepri; G Rezza; P Pezzotti; A Antinori; A N Phillips; G Angarano; V Colangeli; A De Luca; G Ippolito; L Caggese; F Soscia; G Filice; F Gritti; P Narciso; U Tirelli; M Moroni Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-03-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: S Staszewski; J Morales-Ramirez; K T Tashima; A Rachlis; D Skiest; J Stanford; R Stryker; P Johnson; D F Labriola; D Farina; D J Manion; N M Ruiz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-12-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luis F López-Cortés; Pompeyo Viciana; Rosa Ruiz-Valderas; Juan Pasquau; Josefa Ruiz; Fernando Lozano; Dolores Merino; Antonio Vergara; Alberto Terrón; Luis González; Antonio Rivero; Agustin Muñoz-Sanz Journal: AIDS Res Ther Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Laura Dickinson; Marta Boffito; Saye H Khoo; Malte Schutz; Leon J Aarons; Anton L Pozniak; David J Back Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 5.790