Literature DB >> 16926206

Prevention of hip fracture with hip protectors.

Pekka Kannus1, Jari Parkkari.   

Abstract

The prevention of fractures amongst older people consists of (i) prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, (ii) prevention of falling and (iii) prevention of fractures using injury-site protection. As the great majority of hip fractures are caused by a sideways fall with direct impact on the greater trochanter of the proximal femur, one approach to prevention is the use of an adequately configured padded, firm-shield external hip protector. With this type of two-part design, the impacting force and energy are, at the time of the fall-impact, first weakened by the padding part of the protector and then diverted away from the greater trochanter by the shield part of the same. Following this line, a series of consecutive studies by the Accident & Trauma Research Center at the UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland, found that a padded, strong-shield hip protector was effective in preventing hip fractures. In the context of the wider literature on hip protectors, these more encouraging results suggest the need for a more rigorous regulation of protector design and characteristics. Alongside inadequacies of design, the other most frequent general problem with hip protectors is compliance. Not all elderly people with a high risk of hip fracture will agree to use hip protectors and in those who do, long-term adherence may decrease. Caregiver motivation and involvement appear therefore to be crucial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16926206     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  9 in total

1.  Quantitative measurement of hip protector use and compliance.

Authors:  Katherine R Evans; Edmond Lou; Chris Woloschuk; Doug Hill; Meng Li; Man-Sang Wong
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The challenges of interpreting efficacy of hip protector pads in fracture prevention in high-risk seniors.

Authors:  Angela G Juby
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Mechanical evaluation of polymer composite hip protectors.

Authors:  Jose Daniel Diniz Melo; Ayrles S Gonçalves Barbosa; Ricardo Oliveira Guerra
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2010-08-12

4.  Incidence of and factors for self-reported fragility fractures among middle-aged and elderly women in rural Korea: an 11-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Soon-Ki Ahn; Sin Kam; Byung-Yeol Chun
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2014-10-02

5.  Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Over Vastus Lateralis in Patients After Hip Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Junghyun Baek; Nohkyoung Park; Bongju Lee; Sungju Jee; Shinseung Yang; Sangkuk Kang
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 6.  Challenges and strategies in management of osteoporosis and fragility fracture care during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gaurav K Upadhyaya; Karthikeyan Iyengar; Vijay K Jain; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-02

7.  The Influence of Fall Direction and Hip Protector on Fracture Risk: FE Model Predictions Driven by Experimental Data.

Authors:  Ellie S Galliker; Andrew C Laing; Stephen J Ferguson; Benedikt Helgason; Ingmar Fleps
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Simply ask them about their balance--future fracture risk in a nationwide cohort study of twins.

Authors:  Helene Wagner; Håkan Melhus; Rolf Gedeborg; Nancy L Pedersen; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.363

9.  The association between anterior femoroacetabular impingement and femoral neck fractures: An observational study.

Authors:  Pengfei Yang; Huaquan Fan; Xin Wang; Senlin Xu; Liu Yang; Guangxing Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.