OBJECTIVE: The present study used behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) indices of task-switching to examine whether schizophrenia patients have a specific deficit in anticipatory task-set reconfiguration. METHODS: Participants switched between univalent tasks in an alternating runs paradigms with blocked response-stimulus interval (RSI) manipulation (150, 300, 600, and 1200ms). Nineteen high functioning people with schizophrenia were compared to controls that were matched for age, gender, education and premorbid IQ estimate. RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients had overall increased RT, but no increase in corrected RT switch cost. In the schizophrenia group, ERPs showed reduced activation of the differential positivity in anticipation of switch trial at the optimal 600ms RSI and reduced activation of the frontal post-stimulus switch negativity at both 600 and 1200ms RSI compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite no behavioral differences in task switching performance, anticipatory and stimulus-triggered ERP indices of task-switching suggest group differences in processing of switch and repeat trials, especially at longer RSI conditions that for control participants provide opportunity for anticipatory activation of task-set reconfiguration processes. SIGNIFICANCE: These results are compatible with impaired implementation of endogenously driven processes in schizophrenia and greater reliance on external task cues, especially at long preparation intervals.
OBJECTIVE: The present study used behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) indices of task-switching to examine whether schizophreniapatients have a specific deficit in anticipatory task-set reconfiguration. METHODS:Participants switched between univalent tasks in an alternating runs paradigms with blocked response-stimulus interval (RSI) manipulation (150, 300, 600, and 1200ms). Nineteen high functioning people with schizophrenia were compared to controls that were matched for age, gender, education and premorbid IQ estimate. RESULTS:Schizophreniapatients had overall increased RT, but no increase in corrected RT switch cost. In the schizophrenia group, ERPs showed reduced activation of the differential positivity in anticipation of switch trial at the optimal 600ms RSI and reduced activation of the frontal post-stimulus switch negativity at both 600 and 1200ms RSI compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite no behavioral differences in task switching performance, anticipatory and stimulus-triggered ERP indices of task-switching suggest group differences in processing of switch and repeat trials, especially at longer RSI conditions that for control participants provide opportunity for anticipatory activation of task-set reconfiguration processes. SIGNIFICANCE: These results are compatible with impaired implementation of endogenously driven processes in schizophrenia and greater reliance on external task cues, especially at long preparation intervals.
Authors: Jonathan K Wynn; William P Horan; Ann M Kring; Robert F Simons; Michael F Green Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Emily S Kappenman; Samuel T Kaiser; Benjamin M Robinson; Sarah E Morris; Britta Hahn; Valerie M Beck; Carly J Leonard; James M Gold; Steven J Luck Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck; Ann M Kring; Tyler A Lesh; George R Mangun; Tara Niendam; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath; Marjorie Solomon; Tamara Y Swaab; Cameron S Carter Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Steven J Luck; Emily S Kappenman; Rebecca L Fuller; Benjamin Robinson; Ann Summerfelt; James M Gold Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2009-04-06 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Angie A Kehagia; Rong Ye; Dan W Joyce; Orla M Doyle; James B Rowe; Trevor W Robbins Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 3.225