Literature DB >> 16925794

High D-dimer levels at presentation in patients with venous thromboembolism is a marker of adverse clinical outcomes.

S Paneesha1, E Cheyne, K French, S Bacchu, A Borg, P Rose.   

Abstract

Qualitative D-dimer results, together with clinical probability scores, are well established in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The predictive value of quantitative D-dimer levels for various clinical outcomes in VTE patients is not fully understood. D-dimer levels obtained at presentation were analysed in 699 (360 men; 339 women) VTE patients for survival and occurrence of malignancy. Patients were followed for a median of 23 months. 17.2% patients had a D-dimer level >8000 ng FEU/mlat presentation, which was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (P < 0.001). 25.4% patients had malignancy and 4% subsequently developed malignancy following VTE. 29.9% of patients with VTE and malignancy had a D-dimer level >8 mg/l when compared with 13.4% of patients with VTE without malignancy (P < 0.001). 50% of patients who developed subsequent malignancy following VTE had a presentation D-dimer >8000 ng FEU/mlas compared with 13.3% of patients with VTE with out malignancy (P = 0.009). In conclusion, D-dimer >8000 ng FEU/ml at presentation in patients with VTE is a marker of poor OS, EFS and underlying malignancy. Consideration of screening for malignancy is recommended in patients with VTE with a presentation D-dimer >8000 ng FEU/ml and age >60 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16925794     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  6 in total

Review 1.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Quantitative assessment of elevated D-dimers.

Authors:  Gabriela Barizzi; Lorenzo Alberio
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Current status of the Korean venous thromboembolism registry.

Authors:  Doyeun Oh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Tumor-Specific D-Dimer Concentration Ranges and Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Dongqing Li; Dansheng Lei; Feng Yuan; Feng Pei; Huifeng Zhang; Anming Yu; Kun Wang; Hu Chen; Liang Chen; Xianglei Wu; Xianli Tong; Yefu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Study protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study to identify predictors of adverse outcome in older medical emergency department patients (the Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department in Acutely Ill Older Patients (RISE UP) study).

Authors:  Noortje Zelis; Jacqueline Buijs; Peter W de Leeuw; Sander M J van Kuijk; Patricia M Stassen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 6.  Pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory aspects of thrombosis in cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Martina Montagnana; Giovanni Targher; Franco Manzato; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 5.221

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.