Literature DB >> 16925649

Plant-soil feedbacks and invasive spread.

Jonathan M Levine1, Elizaveta Pachepsky, Bruce E Kendall, Stephanie G Yelenik, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers.   

Abstract

Plant invaders have been suggested to change soil microbial communities and biogeochemical cycling in ways that can feedback to benefit themselves. In this paper, we ask when do these feedbacks influence the spread of exotic plants. Because answering this question is empirically challenging, we show how ecological theory on 'pushed' and 'pulled' invasions can be used to examine the problem. We incorporate soil feedbacks into annual plant invasion models, derive the conditions under which such feedbacks affect spread, and support our approach with simulations. We show that in homogeneous landscapes, strong positive feedbacks can influence spreading velocity for annual invaders, but that empirically documented feedbacks are not strong enough to do so. Moreover, to influence spread, invaders must modify the soil environment over a spatial scale larger than is biologically realistic. Though unimportant for annual invader spread in our models, feedbacks do affect invader density and potential impact. We discuss how future research might consider the way landscape structure, dispersal patterns, and the time scales over which plant-soil feedbacks develop regulate the effects of such feedbacks on invader spread.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16925649     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00949.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  24 in total

1.  Plant-soil feedbacks provide an additional explanation for diversity-productivity relationships.

Authors:  Andrew Kulmatiski; Karen H Beard; Justin Heavilin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Spatial interplay of plant competition and consumer foraging mediate plant coexistence and drive the invasion ratchet.

Authors:  John L Orrock; Marissa L Baskett; Robert D Holt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Negative plant-soil feedbacks may limit persistence of an invasive tree due to rapid accumulation of soil pathogens.

Authors:  Somereet Nijjer; William E Rogers; Evan Siemann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Self-reinforcing impacts of plant invasions change over time.

Authors:  Stephanie G Yelenik; Carla M D'Antonio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Weak conspecific feedbacks and exotic dominance in a species-rich savannah.

Authors:  Andrew S MacDougall; Matthias C Rillig; John N Klironomos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Native and non-native ruderals experience similar plant-soil feedbacks and neighbor effects in a system where they coexist.

Authors:  Mariana C Chiuffo; Andrew S MacDougall; José L Hierro
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The native-invasive balance: implications for nutrient cycling in ecosystems.

Authors:  Jonathan E Hickman; Isabel W Ashton; Katherine M Howe; Manuel T Lerdau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Coexistence and relative abundance in plant communities are determined by feedbacks when the scale of feedback and dispersal is local.

Authors:  Keenan M L Mack; James D Bever
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.256

9.  Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states?

Authors:  Tadashi Fukami; Mifuyu Nakajima
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 10.  Empirical and theoretical challenges in aboveground-belowground ecology.

Authors:  Wim H van der Putten; R D Bardgett; P C de Ruiter; W H G Hol; K M Meyer; T M Bezemer; M A Bradford; S Christensen; M B Eppinga; T Fukami; L Hemerik; J Molofsky; M Schädler; C Scherber; S Y Strauss; M Vos; D A Wardle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.