Literature DB >> 16925644

Student perceptions about the characteristics of an effective discussion during the reporting phase in problem-based learning.

Astrid J S F Visschers-Pleijers1, Diana H J M Dolmans, Willem S de Grave, Ineke H A P Wolfhagen, Jan A Jacobs, Cees P M van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

To explore student perceptions of factors contributing to the effectiveness of discussions in the reporting phase of the problem-based learning (PBL) process, where students report and synthesise the results of self-study. Forty-eight Year 1 and 2 medical students participated in 6 focus group interviews about the characteristics of effective group discussions and possible improvements. The data were analysed qualitatively in several stages. The analysis yielded 4 main characteristics of effective discussions: asking for, giving and receiving explanations; integrating and applying knowledge; discussing differences with regard to learning content, and guiding and monitoring the content and the group process of the discussion. Integrating and applying knowledge included structuring, relating and summarising information and providing examples from practice. Discussing different opinions included discussing a variety of literature resources and disagreements. The main learning effects mentioned by the students were retention, understanding, integration and application of knowledge. Students have clear ideas about what promotes effective discussions during the reporting phase. Their PBL experience has provided them with some insights that are in line with theory and research on collaborative learning. Future research should examine differences between student and tutor perceptions of the quality of discussions. Introductions to PBL for students and tutors should include training in asking open but focused questions, supporting explanations with arguments and dealing with conflicts about learning content. Tutors should be trained in giving effective and personal feedback. Collaborative creation of external knowledge representations (i.e. concept maps) should be advocated, as should variety of literature resources.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16925644     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

1.  Student feedback on problem-based learning processes.

Authors:  P Ravi Shankar; Atanu Nandy
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-12-31

2.  Interactive film scenes for tutor training in problem-based learning (PBL): dealing with difficult situations.

Authors:  Hans M Bosse; Soeren Huwendiek; Silvia Skelin; Michael Kirschfink; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Interface between problem-based learning and a learner-centered paradigm.

Authors:  Reza Karimi
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2011-05-13

4.  The relationship between the monitored performance of tutors and students at PBL tutorials and the marked hypotheses generated by students in a hybrid curriculum.

Authors:  Jonas I Addae; Pradeep Sahu; Bidyadhar Sa
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

5.  Does the tutors' academic background influence the learning objectives in problem-based learning?

Authors:  Matthaeus C Grasl; Karl Kremser; Jan Breckwoldt; Andreas Gleiss
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2020-02-17

6.  The perceived effects of faculty presence vs. absence on small-group learning and group dynamics: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Miriam Hoffman; Joanne E Wilkinson; Jin Xu; John Wiecha
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives.

Authors:  Maha Iqbal; Gary M Velan; Anthony J O'Sullivan; Chinthaka Balasooriya
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.