Literature DB >> 16924903

Treatments using hot water instead of lactic acid reduce levels of aerobic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae and reduce the prevalence of Escherichia coil O157:H7 on preevisceration beef carcasses.

Joseph M Bosilevac1, Xiangwu Nou, Genevieve A Barkocy-Gallagher, Terrance M Arthur, Mohammad Koohmaraie.   

Abstract

Lactic acid has become the most commonly used organic acid for treatment of postevisceration beef carcasses. Many processors have also implemented 2% lactic acid washes on preevisceration carcasses. We previously demonstrated that hot water washing and steam vacuuming are effective carcass interventions. Because of the effectiveness of hot water, we compared its use with that of lactic acid as a preevisceration wash in a commercial setting. A commercial hot water carcass wash cabinet applying 74 degrees C (165 degrees F) water for 5.5 s reduced both aerobic plate counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts by 2.7 log CFU/100 cm2 on preevisceration carcasses. A commercial lactic acid spray cabinet that applied 2% L-lactic acid at approximately 42 degrees C (105 to 110 degrees F) to preevisceration carcasses reduced aerobic plate counts by 1.6 log CFU/100 cm2 and Enterobacteriaceae counts by 1.0 log CFU/100 cm2. When the two cabinets were in use sequentially, i.e., hot water followed by lactic acid, aerobic plate counts were reduced by 2.2 log CFU/100 cm2 and Enterobacteriaceae counts were reduced by 2.5 log CFU/100 cm2. Hot water treatments reduced Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence by 81%, and lactic acid treatments reduced E. coli O157:H7 prevalence by 35%, but the two treatments in combination produced a 79% reduction in E. coli O157:H7, a result that was no better than that achieved with hot water alone. These results suggest that hot water would be more beneficial than lactic acid for decontamination of preevisceration beef carcasses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16924903     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.8.1808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  5 in total

Review 1.  Postharvest intervention technologies for safety enhancement of meat and meat based products; a critical review.

Authors:  Muhammad Sohaib; Faqir Muhammad Anjum; Muhammad Sajid Arshad; Ubaid Ur Rahman
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 shedding in cattle by addition of chitosan microparticles to feed.

Authors:  Kwang Cheol Jeong; Min Young Kang; Jihun Kang; David J Baumler; Charles W Kaspar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Strategies for Pathogen Biocontrol Using Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Metabolites: A Focus on Meat Ecosystems and Industrial Environments.

Authors:  Patricia Castellano; Mariana Pérez Ibarreche; Mariana Blanco Massani; Cecilia Fontana; Graciela M Vignolo
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-07-11

4.  Antimicrobial Effect of Calcium Chloride Alone and Combined with Lactic Acid Injected into Chicken Breast Meat.

Authors:  Amali U Alahakoon; Dinesh D Jayasena; Samooel Jung; Hyun Joo Kim; Sun Hyo Kim; Cheorun Jo
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Effect of the Food Additives Sodium Citrate and Disodium Phosphate on Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Production of stx-Phages and Shiga toxin.

Authors:  Lucas J Lenzi; Paula M A Lucchesi; Lucía Medico; Julia Burgán; Alejandra Krüger
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.