Literature DB >> 16924628

Influence of adhesive systems and flowable composite lining on bond strength of class II restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical stresses.

Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti1, Fabio Hiroyuki Ogata Mitsui, Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano, Giselle Maria Marchi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive systems and flowable composite lining on bond strength to gingival margins of Class II restorations after thermal/mechanical stresses. Proximal cavities were prepared in 90 bovine incisors. Teeth were assigned into nine groups (n = 10), according to the combination of bonding agent [Single Bond (SB), Optibond Solo Plus (OP), Prime & Bond NT (NT)] and layer (1 mm) of flowable composite Filtek Flow (FF) [absent, one layer, two layers]. Materials were applied according to manufacturers' instructions, and FF layers were photoactivated separately. Restorations were concluded with composite resin and were submitted to thermal (1000x, 5-55 degrees C) and mechanical stresses (100,000x, 80 N). For microtensile evaluation, slabs from the gingival bonded interface were obtained, tested under tension, and their failure mode was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Bond strength data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey's test. No interaction was observed between adhesive systems and FF lining (p = 0.89). Also, no significant difference was found between bond strength values, whether or not FF layers were used (p = 0.33). However, bonding systems demonstrated significant differences (p = 0.01). SB and NT presented means higher than those observed with OP. Fracture modes varied considerably between experimental groups, and a greater frequency of cohesive failures was noted when FF layers were used. 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16924628     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  5 in total

1.  Effects of three restorative techniques in the bond strength and nanoleakage at gingival wall of Class II restorations subjected to simulated aging.

Authors:  Cristina de Mattos Pimenta Vidal; Sabrina Pavan; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Ana Karina Bedran-Russo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The effects of application time of a self-etching primer and debonding methods on bracket bond strength.

Authors:  Brandon C Parrish; Thomas R Katona; Serkis C Isikbay; Kelton T Stewart; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effects of pulp capping materials on fracture resistance of Class II composite restorations.

Authors:  Ebru Kucukyilmaz; Bilal Yasa; Merve Akcay; Selcuk Savas; Fevzi Kavrik
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

4.  Statistical results on restorative dentistry experiments: effect of the interaction between main variables.

Authors:  Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti; Giselle Maria Marchi; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Hydro-Thermal Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composite Biomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel Pieniak; Krzysztof Przystupa; Agata Walczak; Agata M Niewczas; Aneta Krzyzak; Grzegorz Bartnik; Leszek Gil; Paweł Lonkwic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.