Literature DB >> 16924552

Hip and lumbar continuous motion characteristics during flexion and return in young healthy males.

Poonam Pal1, Stephan Milosavljevic, Gisela Sole, Gillian Johnson.   

Abstract

Studies describing the movement patterns, relative contributions and kinematic characteristics of the lumbar spine and hip present conflicting results. Differences could be due to sample characteristics, methodological issues and descriptive methods. The purpose of this study was to describe the amount and pattern of lumbar spine and hip movement during flexion and return using a range of kinematic and temporal variables. Our aim is to gain a more complete picture of movement patterns taking place at the hip and lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Ultimately the development of a normative database of movement patterns will help to clarify comparative movement interpretation in patients with lumbar back pain. This study analysed lumbar spine and hip motion in group of young healthy males (n = 20) during the flexion and return movement. A motion analysis system captured continuous movement profiles in the sagittal plane. Each participant performed five trials of flexion and return. The angular and velocity data were averaged and used for statistical and descriptive analysis. The kinematic and temporal variables distinguishing statistically significant differences in the lumbar spine and hip movement patterns are not the same for the flexion and return movement. However, within this group four (20%) demonstrated a pattern angular change between the lumbar spine and hip which was different from the other participants. Even within a healthy group of participants individual differences exist in the lumbar spine and hip movement patterns during flexion and return.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16924552      PMCID: PMC2200722          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0200-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip.

Authors:  Raymond Y W Lee; Thomas K T Wong
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  The quantification of low back disorder using motion measures. Methodology and validation.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Ferguson; P Gupta; S Bose; M Parnianpour; J Y Kim; R R Crowell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Relative lumbar and pelvic motion during loaded spinal flexion/extension.

Authors:  J M Nelson; R P Walmsley; J M Stevenson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Posture related to myoelectric silence of erectores spinae during trunk flexion.

Authors:  V Kippers; A W Parker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Is there instability in spondylolisthesis?

Authors:  M Pearcy; J Shepherd
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain.

Authors:  M A Esola; P W McClure; G K Fitzgerald; S Siegler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Hip-spine movement interaction and muscle activation patterns during sagittal trunk movements in low back pain patients.

Authors:  N Paquet; F Malouin; C L Richards
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Effects of low back pain on the relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip.

Authors:  Thomas K T Wong; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  The effect of low-back pain on lumbar spinal movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis.

Authors:  M Pearcy; I Portek; J Shepherd
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The classification of anatomic- and symptom-based low back disorders using motion measure models.

Authors:  W S Marras; M Parnianpour; S A Ferguson; J Y Kim; R R Crowell; S Bose; S R Simon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Timing and magnitude of lumbar spine contribution to trunk forward bending and backward return in patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Milad Vazirian; Elizabeth G Salt; Linda R Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The effect of sagittal hip angle on lumbar and hip coordination and pelvic posterior shift during forward bending.

Authors:  Sun-Shil Shin; Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbopelvic rhythm in the sagittal plane: A review of the effects of participants and task characteristics.

Authors:  Milad Vazirian; Linda R Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Int Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Changes in the flexion-relaxation response induced by hip extensor and erector spinae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Martin Descarreaux; Danik Lafond; Vincent Cantin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Kinematic and temporal interactions of the lumbar spine and hip during trunk extension in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  Stephan Milosavljevic; Poonam Pal; David Bain; Gillian Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Kinematic assessment of hip movement when retrieving an object from the floor.

Authors:  Raheel Shariff; Sunil Panchani; John D Moorehead; Simon J Scott
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  The effect of different lumbar belt designs on the lumbopelvic rhythm in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Jean-Maxime Caron; Richard Preuss; Hakim Mecheri
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Lumbopelvic rhythm during trunk motion in the sagittal plane: A review of the kinematic measurement methods and characterization approaches.

Authors:  Milad Vazirian; Linda Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Phys Ther Rehabil       Date:  2016

9.  Trunk Control Ability after Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery during the Early Postoperative Phase.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Rong-Sen Yang; Chen-Hsi Hsiao; Wei-Li Hsu
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-08-30

10.  An experimental study investigating the effect of pain relief from oral analgesia on lumbar range of motion, velocity, acceleration and movement irregularity.

Authors:  Jonathan M Williams; Inam Haq; Raymond Y Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.