Literature DB >> 16923099

Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section.

S Orbach-Zinger1, L Friedman, A Avramovich, N Ilgiaeva, R Orvieto, J Sulkes, L A Eidelman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify parturients at risk of inability to extend labor epidural analgesia in whom alternative methods of anesthesia should be considered for Cesarean section (CS).
METHODS: For 6 months, we prospectively studied women undergoing a CS with a functioning epidural catheter in place from the delivery ward. All parturients received the same epidural protocol: bolus of bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl, then bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl (2 microg/ml) 10-15 ml/h and an additional 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% top-ups according to patient request. Sixteen millilitres of lidocaine 2%, 1 ml of bicarbonate, and 100 microg of fentanyl were given for CS. Failed epidural analgesia was defined as the need to convert to general anesthesia.
RESULTS: Of the 101 parturients studied, 20 (19.8%) required conversion to general anesthesia. In univariate analysis, the likelihood of failed epidural anesthesia was inversely correlated with parturient's age (P = 0.014) and directly correlated with pre-pregnancy weight (P = 0.019), weight at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.003), body mass index (BMI) at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.0004), gestational week (P = 0.008), number of top-ups (P = 0.0004) and visual analog scale (VAS) 2 h before CS (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, the number of top-ups in the delivery ward was the best predictor of epidural anesthesia failure (odds ratio 4.39, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Younger, more obese parturients at a higher gestational week, requiring more top-ups during labor, having a higher VAS in the 2 h before CS are at risk of inability to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16923099     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  7 in total

1.  Algorithm for the anesthetic management of cesarean delivery in patients with unsatisfactory labor epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Sonia Vaida; Davide Cattano; Debra Hurwitz; Berend Mets
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-04-24

2.  Efficacy of electrical stimulation on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Young Sung Kim; Hyo Sung Kim; Hyerim Jeong; Chung Hun Lee; Mi Kyoung Lee; Sang Sik Choi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Association of chorioamnionitis with failed conversion of epidural labor analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yumi Katakura; Yusuke Nagamine; Takahisa Goto; Hiroyuki Sumikura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Emergency Cesarean Delivery in a High-volume High-resource Referral Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kenas Wiskott; Raed Jebrin; Daniel Ioscovich; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Aharon Tevet; Daniel Shatalin; Alexander Ioscovich
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  Evaluation of failed and high blocks associated with spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery following inadequate labour epidural: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa M Einhorn; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.713

6.  What is the failure rate in extending labour analgesia in patients with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2)compared with patients with a body mass index < 30 kg/m(2)? a retrospective pilot study.

Authors:  Victoria A Eley; Andre van Zundert; Leonie Callaway
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Epidural extension failure in obese women is comparable to that of non-obese women.

Authors:  V A Eley; A Chin; I Tham; J Poh; P Aujla; E Glasgow; H Brown; K Steele; L Webb; A van Zundert
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 2.105

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.