Literature DB >> 16923000

Predictors of response to the head-up tilt test in patients with unexplained syncope or presyncope.

Babak Kazemi1, Majid Haghjoo, Arash Arya, Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unexplained syncope is a relatively frequent symptom, mostly caused by a neurocardiogenic reaction. The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of response to head-up tilt testing (HUTT) in patients with unexplained syncope or presyncope.
METHODS: HUTT was done in 640 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope or presyncope (393 men, mean age 45+/-19 years) after initial workup including history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory evaluation.
RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-four (54%) patients had a positive result. The most common type of response was mixed type (46%) followed by vasodepressor (39%) and cardioinhibitory (15%) types. Age, gender, presence of structural heart disease, baseline heart rhythm, and the presenting symptom before the test failed to predict a positive response to HUTT, but among patients with a positive response to the test, age (OR: 1.54, CI = 1.04-2.47, P = 0.016) and presyncope (OR: 2.16, CI = 1.2-3.85, P = 0.008) as the presenting symptom predicted a vasodepressor type of response. The age (OR: 1.58, CI = 1.29-3.94, P = 0.01) and presyncope (OR: 4.6, CI = 1.74-12.24, P = 0.001) were also predictors for test positivity in the active stage.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an age-related gradient in hemodynamic response during neurocardiogenic syncope. The elderly patients more commonly had a vasodepressor and late response, in the active stage, but young subjects more commonly experienced an earlier and cardioinhibitory or mixed responses in the passive stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16923000     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00450.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  C825T G-protein beta3 subunit gene polymorphism, tilt test results and point score in syncopal patients.

Authors:  Malgorzata Lelonek; Tadeusz Pietrucha; Monika Matyjaszczyk; Jan Henryk Goch
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  Physiological phenomenology of neurally-mediated syncope with management implications.

Authors:  Christoph Schroeder; Jens Tank; Karsten Heusser; André Diedrich; Friedrich C Luft; Jens Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of cortisol levels in patients with vasovagal syncope and postural tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  Humaira Fayyaz Khan; Shazadi Ambreen; Hammad Raziq; Azmat Hayat
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Unexplained syncope: implications of age and gender on patient characteristics and evaluation, the diagnostic yield of an implantable loop recorder, and the subsequent treatment.

Authors:  Nils Edvardsson; Claudio Garutti; Guido Rieger; Nicholas J Linker
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Age and the Head-Up Tilt Test Outcome in Syncope Patients.

Authors:  Rezvan Noormand; Akbar Shafiee; Gholamreza Davoodi; Fatemeh Tavakoli; Alireza Gheini; Ahmad Yaminisharif; Arash Jalali; Saeed Sadeghian
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  Syncope as a health risk for soldiers - influence of medical history and clinical findings on the sensitivity of head-up tilt table testing.

Authors:  Hagen Frickmann; Sven Andreas Jungblut; Hans-Joachim Gilfrich; Lena Marie Heidelmann; Franziska Grube
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2015-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.