Literature DB >> 16922897

Multiparameter quantitative computer-assisted tomography assessment of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

David G Campbell1, Luke J Johnson, Simon C West.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a popular alternative to total knee replacement in selected patients. Component alignment has not yet been described by computer-assisted tomography (CAT) imaging techniques; these have been developed for total knee arthroplasty analysis. The aims of this study were to report two new technologies; a new unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system was radiographically assessed with a new CAT scan protocol.
METHODS: In a consecutive cohort study, 60 knees were analysed by the 'UniCAT Protocol'. Patients were implanted with a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system that uses a unique ligament tensor for femoral component alignment. The uniCAT protocol requires a long anteroposterior and lateral scout scan to measure limb alignment and component orientation. A spiral computer-assisted tomography at the knee is used to measure component rotation. The total scan time was 20 s with a calculated unshielded radiation dose of 1 mSv or less.
RESULTS: The mechanical axis had a mean of 2.7 degrees varus. Femoral components were implanted with a mean of 0.37 degrees valgus and 1.3 degrees flexion. Tibial components were implanted with a mean 3.47 degrees varus and 5.1 degrees posterior slope. Femoral components were externally rotated a mean of 3.36 degrees, tibial components were externally rotated 6.59 degrees from the posterior tibia and 5.68 degrees from the transepicondylar axis.
CONCLUSION: The UniCAT protocol uses less radiation than whole-limb spiral scans and is a method that can be used with all modern computer-assisted tomography machines. The coronal and sagital alignment results compare favourably with previous published reports without computer-assisted tomography. Component rotation has not previously been reported and its implications are yet to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16922897     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  8 in total

1.  Tibial component rotation during the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the anterior superior iliac spine an appropriate landmark?

Authors:  Seung-Yup Lee; Suhwoo Chay; Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Sagittal flexion angle of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is it same for both medial and lateral UKAs?

Authors:  Elcil Kaya Bicer; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anteroposterior and rotational stability in fixed and mobile bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study using the robotic force sensor system.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Christian Mauer; Christian Stärke; Mathias Brosz; Thore Zantop; Christoph H Lohmann; Martin Schulze
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sebastien Lustig; Corey J Scholes; Tim J Stegeman; Sam Oussedik; Myles R J Coolican; David A Parker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks.

Authors:  M L Dao Trong; C Diezi; G Goerres; N Helmy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Limb position influences component orientation in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Shantanu Patil; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Effect of vertical cut on coronal coverage and rotation of tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guanghan Gao; Zheng Li; Yannong Wang; Guangzhong Yang; Jiang Huang; Shuai An; Junjie Qiao; Guanglei Cao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Effects of posterior tibial slope on the mid-term results of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhijie Chen; Kaizhe Chen; Yufei Yan; Jianmin Feng; Yi Wang; Zhihong Liu; Qingming Yang; Chuan He
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-04-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.