Literature DB >> 16921993

A new instrument for predicting pressure ulcer risk in an intensive care unit.

Hiromi Sanada, Junko Sugama, Brian Thigpen, Atsuko Kitagawa, Sachiko Kinosita, Shizuko Murayama.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of two instruments (the Braden scale and a multi-pad pressure evaluator) for predicting pressure ulcer development. A prospective cohort design was used and 105 intensive care unit patients participated in this study. The result was a 33% incidence of pressure ulcers. Both the Braden score and the multi-pad pressure evaluator instruments gave significant differences between patients who did and did not develop pressure ulcers. The predictive validity of these tools was calculated. The results indicated that the multi-pad pressure evaluator provided the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. We suggest that the multi-pad pressure evaluator may be better suited for assessing the risk of pressure ulcers in intensive care units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16921993     DOI: 10.1016/s0965-206x(06)63006-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  7 in total

1.  A case of pressure ulcer development on a patient's ear as a result of pulse oximetry probe.

Authors:  Sedigheh Iranmanesh; Hossein Rafiei; Mohammad Esmaeili Abdar
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Relationship between Braden scale score and pressure ulcer development in patients admitted in trauma intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sedigheh Iranmanesh; Hossein Rafiei; Sakineh Sabzevari
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Microclimate and development of pressure ulcers and superficial skin changes.

Authors:  Saldy Yusuf; Mayumi Okuwa; Yoshie Shigeta; Misako Dai; Terumi Iuchi; Sulaiman Rahman; Awaluddin Usman; Sukmawati Kasim; Junko Sugama; Toshio Nakatani; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Extrinsic risk factors for pressure ulcers early in the hospital stay: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Mona Baumgarten; David J Margolis; A Russell Localio; Sarah H Kagan; Robert A Lowe; Bruce Kinosian; Stephanie B Abbuhl; William Kavesh; John H Holmes; Althea Ruffin; Tesfa Mehari
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Pressure ulcers in four Indonesian hospitals: prevalence, patient characteristics, ulcer characteristics, prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Yufitriana Amir; Christa Lohrmann; Ruud Jg Halfens; Jos Mga Schols
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sookyung Hyun; Brenda Vermillion; Cheryl Newton; Monica Fall; Xiaobai Li; Pacharmon Kaewprag; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Elizabeth R Lenz
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T).

Authors:  Susanne Coleman; Isabelle L Smith; Elizabeth McGinnis; Justin Keen; Delia Muir; Lyn Wilson; Nikki Stubbs; Carol Dealey; Sarah Brown; E Andrea Nelson; Jane Nixon
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.187

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.