Literature DB >> 1692125

Acute atrial endocardial P wave amplitude and chronic pacemaker sensitivity requirements: relation to patient age and presence of sinus node disease.

J Brandt1, R Attewell, T Fåhraeus, H Schüller.   

Abstract

Data are reviewed from 88 patients who received double, passive-fixation unipolar endocardial leads for DDD pacemaker treatment. Identical electrodes were used in the right atrium and the right ventricle. Intra-atrial P wave amplitudes, intraventricular QRS complex amplitudes, and atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds were determined at implantation. The intra-atrial P wave amplitudes were not significantly correlated to the intraventricular QRS complex amplitudes. No significant correlation was found between the atrial stimulation thresholds and the ventricular pacing thresholds. The intra-atrial P wave amplitude showed a significant inverse and logarithmic correlation with patient age (P = 0.007). Furthermore, patients with sinus node disease had significantly lower intra-atrial P wave amplitudes (P = 0.04) than patients without this abnormality. The acute atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds and the intraventricular QRS complex amplitude were not correlated to patient age or presence of sinus node disease. Patients requiring higher atrial amplifier sensitivity settings during follow-up were significantly older (P less than 0.05) than those in whom lower atrial sensitivities were sufficient. A postoperative attenuation of the atrial electrogram was detectable by sensitivity programming procedures in 29 of the patients (35%). This phenomenon did not significantly relate to patient age or presence of sinus node disease. No case of permanent atrial undersensing occurred. It is suggested that the lower intra-atrial P wave amplitudes in older patients and patients with sinus node disease reflect degenerative changes in the atrial myocardium. The statistical relations found appear to motivate special attention to atrial sensing in these patient groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1692125     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02056.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

1.  Atrial near-field and ventricular far-field analysis by automated signal processing at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Martin Lipphardt; Ulrich G Hofmann; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Long term complications in single and dual chamber pacing are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity.

Authors:  F Eberhardt; F Bode; H Bonnemeier; F Boguschewski; M Schlei; W Peters; U K H Wiegand
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Intracardiac atrial signal amplitude in congenital and acquired complete heart block.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Samiei Nasab; Mohammad Reza Dehghani; Mehrdad Taherioun; Alireza Rostamzadeh
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-10-31

4.  Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Electrocardiographic Predictors of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation after Dual-Chamber Pacemaker Implantation: An Integrated Scoring Model Approach.

Authors:  Min Soo Cho; Jun Kim; Ju Hyeon Kim; Minsu Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; You Mi Hwang; Uk Jo; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; You-Ho Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.