Literature DB >> 16920056

Clinical diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a comparison study between standardized graded direct microscopy and ITS1-PCR of Giemsa-stained smears.

A Al-Jawabreh1, G Schoenian, O Hamarsheh, W Presber.   

Abstract

Parasitological diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis is absolutely necessary before treatment. Direct microscopy of scrapings taken from the margins of skin lesions is the most commonly used method for clinical diagnosis of leishmaniasis. In this study to evaluate the usage of stained smears as samples for PCR and the possible advantage of PCR, we compared the sensitivity of the diagnosis of Giemsa-stained skin scrapings by standardized graded direct microscopy with that of ITS1-PCR with the material of the same area of the slide. Three 5mm x 5mm squares were marked on each of the 20 Giemsa-stained touch smears from 20 clinically diagnosed Palestinian patients. Out of the 60 squares scanned for amastigotes under 100x oil-immersion light microscopy, 45 (75%) gave usable results and 23 of these were positive for Leishmania. Fifteen (25%) squares could not be scanned microscopically, 12 because of staining that was too thick and 3 because of inadequate staining. DNA from each scanned square was extracted separately after microscopy and run through ITS1-PCR. Of the 23 microscopy-positive squares, 20 (87%) of these were positive by PCR. Of the three that were negative, one failed to extract for DNA, the second showed only one amastigote in the entire square, and the third was normally graded as +1 but was not amplified for unknown reasons. Of the 22 squares negative for microscopy, 18 (82%) were ITS1-PCR positive. Additionally, all three improperly stained squares were ITS1-PCR positive. Of the 12 darkly stained squares, 11 were positive. A negative control group of 15 German individuals from which Giemsa-stained slides containing three squares each was prepared and these slides were also microscopically scanned and tested by ITS1-PCR. Both tests were negative with both methods. Compared to microscopy (data in parenthesis), PCR showed a sensitivity of 87% (37%) and a specificity of 100% (100%). We have concluded that Giemsa-stained smears are a readily usable sampling method for PCR and that ITS1-PCR is far more sensitive than microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16920056     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  28 in total

1.  Isolation and identification of cutaneous leishmaniasis species by PCR-RFLP in Ilam province, the west of Iran.

Authors:  Ali Kermanjani; Lame Akhlaghi; Hormozd Oormazdi; Ramtin Hadighi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2016-04-07

2.  Diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis: why punch when you can scrape?

Authors:  Mario Saab; Hussein El Hage; Khalil Charafeddine; Robert H Habib; Ibrahim Khalifeh
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Head and neck cutaneous leishmania: clinical characteristics, microscopic features and molecular analysis in a cohort of 168 cases.

Authors:  Gabriel Dunya; Robert Habib; Roger V Moukarbel; Ibrahim Khalifeh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of Molecular, Microscopic, and Culture Methods for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Sima Rasti; Baharak Ghorbanzadeh; Farnaz Kheirandish; Seyed Gholamabbas Mousavi; Ahmad Pirozmand; Hossein Hooshyar; Bathol Abani
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Diagnosis and identification of Leishmania spp. from Giemsa-stained slides, by real-time PCR and melting curve analysis in south-west of Iran.

Authors:  S Khademvatan; N Neisi; S Maraghi; J Saki
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  2011-12

6.  Endemic transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in Bhutan.

Authors:  Thinley Yangzom; Israel Cruz; Caryn Bern; Daniel Argaw; Margriet den Boer; Iván Dario Vélez; Sujit K Bhattacharya; Ricardo Molina; Jorge Alvar
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Comparison between quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, real-time reverse transcriptase PCR, and real-time PCR for quantification of Leishmania parasites.

Authors:  Wendy van der Meide; Jorge Guerra; Gerard Schoone; Marit Farenhorst; Leíla Coelho; William Faber; Inge Peekel; Henk Schallig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Molecular Identification of Leishmania spp. DNA from Archived Giemsa-Stained Slides of Patients from Salta, Argentina.

Authors:  María Cristina Almazán; Carlos Lorenzo Hoyos; Alejandro Javier Krolewiecki; Silvana Pamela Cajal; Griselda Noemí Copa; Pedro Emanuel Fleitas; Paola Andrea Barroso; Jorge Diego Marco; Julio Rubén Nasser; José Fernando Gil
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Molecular and parasitological study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Bushehr province, southwest of the Islamic Republic of Iran: a cross-sectional study during 2009-2012.

Authors:  Mehdi Mohebali; Hossein Darabi; Homa Hajjaran; Mohammad Reza Shirzadi; Moradali Fouladvand; Soroor Charehdar; Mohammad Taghi Satvat; Foroogh Pakbaz; Katayoun Vahdat
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2013-12-12

10.  Identification of leishmania species using PCR assay on giemsa-stained slides prepared from cutaneous leishmaniasis patients.

Authors:  Farnaz Kheirandish; Ali Chegeni Sharafi; Bahram Kazemi; Mehdi Mohebali; Amanollah Sarlak; Mohamad Javad Tarahi; Kourosh Holakouee; Homa Hajaran
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.