Literature DB >> 16919938

In vitro biosorption of ochratoxin A on the yeast industry by-products: comparison of isotherm models.

Diana Ringot1, Benoit Lerzy, Kathy Chaplain, Jean-Paul Bonhoure, Eric Auclair, Yvan Larondelle.   

Abstract

Biosorption of ochratoxin A (OA) onto yeast biomass appears to be a reasonably low cost decontamination method. In vitro adsorption of OA onto three yeast industry by-products: a vinasse containing yeast cell walls (EX16), a purified yeast beta-glucan (BETA) and a yeast cell wall fraction (LEC) was examined at 25 degrees C. Seven classical adsorption models were tested to provide the best description of toxin adsorption. A comparison of these models was performed using the magnitude of the coefficient of determination R(2) for the linear models and the value of the sum of normalised errors (SNE) for linear and non-linear models. Based on the R(2) and the SNE values, Hill, Freundlich and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller equations produced the best models for OA biosorption onto respectively, EX16, BETA and LEC. For these best models, the values of isotherm constants were consistent when measured using both linear and non-linear calculations. The SNE calculation procedure presented in this paper in association with the linear equation analysis method is an appropriate approach for designing a better adsorption isothermal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919938     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  8 in total

1.  Removal of arsenic(III,V) by a granular Mn-oxide-doped Al oxide adsorbent: surface characterization and performance.

Authors:  Kun Wu; Jin Zhang; Bing Chang; Ting Liu; Furong Zhang; Pengkang Jin; Wendong Wang; Xiaochang Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Chemical, physical and biological approaches to prevent ochratoxin induced toxicoses in humans and animals.

Authors:  János Varga; Sándor Kocsubé; Zsanett Péteri; Csaba Vágvölgyi; Beáta Tóth
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall components as tools for ochratoxin a decontamination.

Authors:  Małgorzata Piotrowska; Anna Masek
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 4.  In-Vitro Cell Culture for Efficient Assessment of Mycotoxin Exposure, Toxicity and Risk Mitigation.

Authors:  Ran Xu; Niel A Karrow; Umesh K Shandilya; Lv-Hui Sun; Haruki Kitazawa
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Comparative In Vitro Assessment of a Range of Commercial Feed Additives with Multiple Mycotoxin Binding Claims.

Authors:  Oluwatobi Kolawole; Julie Meneely; Brett Greer; Olivier Chevallier; David S Jones; Lisa Connolly; Christopher Elliott
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Comparative Evaluation of the Capacity of Commercial and Autochthonous Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains to Remove Ochratoxin A from Natural and Synthetic Grape Juices.

Authors:  Islem Dammak; Norah Salem Alsaiari; Imene Fhoula; Abdelfattah Amari; Zohra Hamdi; Mnasser Hassouna; Faouzi Ben Rebah; Tahar Mechichi; Salma Lasram
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  The use of innovative and efficient nanocomposite (magnetic graphene oxide) for the reduction on of Fusarium mycotoxins in palm kernel cake.

Authors:  A A Pirouz; J Selamat; S Z Iqbal; H Mirhosseini; R Abedi Karjiban; F Abu Bakar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Advances in Biodetoxification of Ochratoxin A-A Review of the Past Five Decades.

Authors:  Wenying Chen; Chen Li; Boyang Zhang; Zheng Zhou; Yingbin Shen; Xin Liao; Jieyeqi Yang; Yan Wang; Xiaohong Li; Yuzhe Li; Xiao L Shen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.