Literature DB >> 16919838

Incorporation of public hospitals: a "silver bullet" against overcapacity, managerial bottlenecks and resource constraints? Case studies from Austria and Estonia.

Armin H Fidler1, Reinhard R Haslinger, Maria M Hofmarcher, Maris Jesse, Toomas Palu.   

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach for incorporating public hospitals by contrasting the experience from an "old" EU country (Austria) with a new EU member state (Estonia). In the EU (including the new member states) hospital overcapacity is a serious problem, from a technical, fiscal and political perspective. Few countries have succeeded in establishing an appropriate framework for resource management and for guaranteeing long-term financial viability of their hospital network. Many countries are in search of effective policies for improved hospital management and more cost-effective resource use in the health sector. Over the past decade, experiences in Austria and Estonia have emerged as innovative examples which may provide lessons for other EU countries and beyond. This paper describes the evolution of public hospitals from public budgetary units and public management to incorporated autonomous organizations under private corporate law, resulting in a contractual relationship between (public) owners and private hospital management. Outdated and inefficient public sector structures were replaced by more agile corporate management. The arrangement allows for investments, operating costs and budgeting according to strategic business goals as opposed to political "fiat". Shielding hospitals from local political influence is an important aspect of this concept. Horizontal integration through networking of public hospitals and introducing private management helps create a new corporate culture, allowing for more flexibility to achieve efficiencies through downsizing and economies of scale. Based on contracts the new balance between ownership and managerial functions create strong incentives for a more business-like, results-oriented and consumer-friendly management. This was achieved both in Austria and Estonia in a politically sensitive way, adopting a long-term vision and by protecting the interests of hospital owners and staff.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919838     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

Review 1.  Can questions of the privatization and corporatization, and the autonomy and accountability of public hospitals, ever be resolved?

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Joanne F Travaglia; Angus Corbett
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  Advantages and disadvantages of different methods of hospitals' downsizing: a narrative systematic review.

Authors:  Yalda Mousazadeh; Ali Jannati; Hossein Jabbari Beiramy; Mohammad Asgharijafarabadi; Ali Ebadi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 3.  Efficiency and optimal size of hospitals: Results of a systematic search.

Authors:  Monica Giancotti; Annamaria Guglielmo; Marianna Mauro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: Assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors.

Authors:  Sofia Xesfingi; Athanassios Vozikis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Efficiency and scale effect of county public hospitals in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Qian Li; Liqi Tian; Xiaolin Jing; Xianghua Chen; Jiangfeng Li; Huixin Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.