Literature DB >> 16919819

Models of anxiety: responses of mice to novelty and open spaces in a 3D maze.

A Ennaceur1, S Michalikova, R van Rensburg, P L Chazot.   

Abstract

The present report describes the emotional responses of different strains of mice to exposure to a novel open space model of anxiety using a 3D spatial navigation task. The 3D maze is modification of the radial maze with flexible arms that can be raised above or lowered below the horizontal level of a central platform. To access the arms animals need to cross a bridge linking the arms to the central platform. In this model, mice are exposed to novelty in an unfamiliar open space setting with no safe alternative. Fear from novelty is compounded with the need to explore. The drive to escape and the drive to approach are intermingled making this open space model radically different from the current models of anxiety which provide animals with the choice between safe and anxiogenic spaces. In a series of experiments, we examined the behaviour of different groups of mice from C57, C3H, CD1 and Balb/c strains. In the first experiment, different groups of C57 mice were tested in one of the three arms configurations. In the second experiment, C57 mice were compared to C3H mice. In the third experiment, C57 mice were compared to CD1 and Balb/c mice in the raised arm configuration over three successive sessions. In the fourth experiment, we examined the behaviour of C57 mice in the lowered arm configuration with an open and an enclosed central. In the final experiment, we examined the difference between C57 and C3H mice of both genders. Using several spatio-temporal parameters of the transition responses between central platform, bridges and arms, we have been able to show consistent results demonstrating significant differences between C57 and C3H mice, and between Balb/c and both C57 and CD1 mice. C3H appear more anxious than C57 mice, and Balb/c mice seem more anxious than C57 and CD1 mice. We also observed significant differences between sexes in C3H mice but not in C57 mice. C3H male mice appear more anxious than C3H female mice and than both C57 male and female mice. In the lowered arm configuration with an enclosed central platform, C57 mice took longer time to make a first entry to an arm, made more visits to bridges before first entry to an arm and required longer time between re-entries to arms, spent longer time on the central platform and shorter time on arms compared to mice in the other arm configurations. They also made frequent entries to the centre and bridges compared to mice in the lowered arm with an open central platform. These results demonstrate not only the sensitivity of the parameters of the test but also the consistencies and concordances of the results which make this 3D maze a valuable new tool in the study of the underlying neural mechanisms of anxiety responses in addition to learning and memory, and in assessing the effects of potential anxiolytic drugs. In this report we examine methodological issues related to the design of animal behavioural paradigms and question the value and the construct validity of the current models of human anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919819     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Age- and speed-dependent modulation of gaits in DSCAM2J mutant mice.

Authors:  Louise Thiry; Maxime Lemieux; Frédéric Bretzner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparison of nicotine oral consumption and baseline anxiety measures in adolescent and adult C57BL/6J and C3H/Ibg mice.

Authors:  Jennifer A Wilking; Kirstin G Hesterberg; Vivian H Nguyen; Amanda P Cyboron; Amy Y Hua; Jerry A Stitzel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Assessing negative affect in mice during abstinence from alcohol drinking: Limitations and future challenges.

Authors:  Solal Bloch; Katherine M Holleran; Thomas L Kash; Elena M Vazey; Jennifer A Rinker; Christina L Lebonville; Krysten O'Hara; Marcelo F Lopez; Sara R Jones; Kathleen A Grant; Howard C Becker; Patrick J Mulholland
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Sex- and β-arrestin-dependent effects of kappa opioid receptor-mediated ethanol consumption.

Authors:  Alexander R French; Anna M Gutridge; Jinling Yuan; Q Hawk Royer; Richard M van Rijn
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.697

5.  Automated video analysis system reveals distinct diurnal behaviors in C57BL/6 and C3H/HeN mice.

Authors:  E B Adamah-Biassi; I Stepien; R L Hudson; M L Dubocovich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  What Animal Models Can Tell Us About Long-Term Psychiatric Symptoms in Sepsis Survivors: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Felipe Dal-Pizzol; Gabriela Ferreira de Medeiros; Monique Michels; Aurélien Mazeraud; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Cristiane Ritter; Tarek Sharshar
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Effects of methimepip and JNJ-5207852 in Wistar rats exposed to an open-field with and without object and in Balb/c mice exposed to a radial-arm maze.

Authors:  Rushdie M A Abuhamdah; Ruan van Rensburg; Natasha L Lethbridge; Abdel Ennaceur; Paul L Chazot
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-16

Review 8.  The Role of the Melatoninergic System in Circadian and Seasonal Rhythms-Insights From Different Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Martina Pfeffer; Charlotte von Gall; Helmut Wicht; Horst-Werner Korf
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 9.  The importance of cognitive phenotypes in experimental modeling of animal anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Allan V Kalueff; Dennis L Murphy
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Spontaneous sleep-like brain state alternations and breathing characteristics in urethane anesthetized mice.

Authors:  Silvia Pagliardini; Simon Gosgnach; Clayton T Dickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.