Literature DB >> 16919641

History-dependence of isometric muscle force: effect of prior stretch or shortening amplitude.

Sharon R Bullimore1, Tim R Leonard, Dilson E Rassier, Walter Herzog.   

Abstract

It is well-recognised that steady-state isometric muscle force is decreased following active shortening (force depression, FD) and increased following active stretch (force enhancement, FE). It has also been demonstrated that passive muscle force is increased following active stretch (passive FE). Several studies have reported that FD increases with shortening amplitude and that FE and passive FE increase with stretch amplitude. Here, we investigate whether these trends continue with further increases in shortening or stretch amplitude. Experiments were performed using in situ cat soleus muscles (n=8 for FD; n=7 for FE and passive FE). FD, FE and passive FE were measured after shortening or stretch contractions that covered as wide a range of amplitudes as practically possible without damaging the muscles. FD increased approximately linearly with shortening amplitude, over the full range of amplitudes investigated. This is consistent with the hypothesis that FD arises from a stress-induced inhibition of crossbridges. FE increased with stretch amplitude only up to a point, and then levelled off. Passive FE, and the transient increase in force at the end of stretch, showed relationships to stretch amplitude that were qualitatively very similar to the relationship for FE, increasing only until the same critical stretch amplitude had been reached. We conclude that FE and passive FE do not increase with stretch amplitude under all circumstances. This finding has important consequences for determining the mechanisms underlying FE and passive FE because any mechanism that is proposed to explain them must be able to predict it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919641     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

1.  Residual force enhancement in myofibrils and sarcomeres.

Authors:  V Joumaa; T R Leonard; W Herzog
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mitigating the bilateral deficit: reducing neural deficits through residual force enhancement and activation reduction.

Authors:  Graham Z MacDonald; Nicole Mazara; Walter Herzog; Geoffrey A Power
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Passive force enhancement in striated muscle.

Authors:  Walter Herzog
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-05-09

4.  Perturbation-induced fast drifts in finger enslaving.

Authors:  Joseph Ricotta; Cristian Cuadra; Jacob S Evans; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Recent developments in understanding the length dependence of contractile response of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Brian R MacIntosh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Residual force enhancement: the neglected property of striated muscle contraction.

Authors:  Walter Herzog; Tim R Leonard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Stiffness, working stroke, and force of single-myosin molecules in skeletal muscle: elucidation of these mechanical properties via nonlinear elasticity evaluation.

Authors:  Motoshi Kaya; Hideo Higuchi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  A new experimental model to study force depression: the Drosophila jump muscle.

Authors:  Ryan A Koppes; Douglas M Swank; David T Corr
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-05-01

Review 9.  The multiple roles of titin in muscle contraction and force production.

Authors:  Walter Herzog
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2018-01-20

10.  The effect of muscle length on force depression after active shortening in soleus muscle of mice.

Authors:  Pieter Van Noten; Marc Van Leemputte
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.