Literature DB >> 16919296

Insights into protein-protein interfaces using a Bayesian network prediction method.

James R Bradford1, Chris J Needham, Andrew J Bulpitt, David R Westhead.   

Abstract

Identifying the interface between two interacting proteins provides important clues to the function of a protein, and is becoming increasing relevant to drug discovery. Here, surface patch analysis was combined with a Bayesian network to predict protein-protein binding sites with a success rate of 82% on a benchmark dataset of 180 proteins, improving by 6% on previous work and well above the 36% that would be achieved by a random method. A comparable success rate was achieved even when evolutionary information was missing, a further improvement on our previous method which was unable to handle incomplete data automatically. In a case study of the Mog1p family, we showed that our Bayesian network method can aid the prediction of previously uncharacterised binding sites and provide important clues to protein function. On Mog1p itself a putative binding site involved in the SLN1-SKN7 signal transduction pathway was detected, as was a Ran binding site, previously characterized solely by conservation studies, even though our automated method operated without using homologous proteins. On the remaining members of the family (two structural genomics targets, and a protein involved in the photosystem II complex in higher plants) we identified novel binding sites with little correspondence to those on Mog1p. These results suggest that members of the Mog1p family bind to different proteins and probably have different functions despite sharing the same overall fold. We also demonstrated the applicability of our method to drug discovery efforts by successfully locating a number of binding sites involved in the protein-protein interaction network of papilloma virus infection. In a separate study, we attempted to distinguish between the two types of binding site, obligate and non-obligate, within our dataset using a second Bayesian network. This proved difficult although some separation was achieved on the basis of patch size, electrostatic potential and conservation. Such was the similarity between the two interacting patch types, we were able to use obligate binding site properties to predict the location of non-obligate binding sites and vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919296     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  40 in total

1.  Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites with Machine-Learning-Based Data-Cleaning and Post-Filtering Procedures.

Authors:  Guang-Hui Liu; Hong-Bin Shen; Dong-Jun Yu
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  In silico modeling of pH-optimum of protein-protein binding.

Authors:  Rooplekha C Mitra; Zhe Zhang; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-12-22

3.  Improved prediction of protein binding sites from sequences using genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Xiuquan Du; Jiaxing Cheng; Jie Song
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Using support vector machine combined with post-processing procedure to improve prediction of interface residues in transient complexes.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Yanhong Zhou
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Molecular surface mesh generation by filtering electron density map.

Authors:  Joachim Giard; Benoît Macq
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-12

6.  ConPlex: a server for the evolutionary conservation analysis of protein complex structures.

Authors:  Yoon Sup Choi; Seong Kyu Han; Jinho Kim; Jae-Seong Yang; Jouhyun Jeon; Sung Ho Ryu; Sanguk Kim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Prediction of protein-protein binding site by using core interface residue and support vector machine.

Authors:  Nan Li; Zhonghua Sun; Fan Jiang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Regression applied to protein binding site prediction and comparison with classification.

Authors:  Joachim Giard; Jérôme Ambroise; Jean-Luc Gala; Benoît Macq
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Common physical basis of macromolecule-binding sites in proteins.

Authors:  Yao Chi Chen; Carmay Lim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  PCRPi: Presaging Critical Residues in Protein interfaces, a new computational tool to chart hot spots in protein interfaces.

Authors:  Salam A Assi; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Terence H Rabbitts; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.