Literature DB >> 16918836

Developing inclusive partnerships: user-defined outcomes, networking and knowledge--a case study.

Peter Beresford1, Fran Branfield.   

Abstract

Two major developments have been associated with the reorientation of United Kingdom health and social care policy and provision in recent years, placing a new emphasis on: quality and 'outcome' measures; and service user (and public and patient) involvement. These issues have become central to health and social care, representing expressions of the shift in political and ideological interest in public policy. However, these two strands of development have tended to be treated as discrete discourses and have developed separately in policy. Nevertheless, it can hardly be assumed that what policy makers, service planners, providers and purchasers would value and prioritise as good quality would necessarily coincide with what service users would want. Developing effective partnership working needs to go beyond considerations of organisations and professional groupings, and fully involve service users as one of the key stakeholders. This paper describes the findings of three projects undertaken by Shaping Our Lives. These studies confirmed that service-user concepts of outcomes and quality may differ significantly from those currently employed; moreover, service users are able to offer a complex and sophisticated model of what outcome measures might look like if they were centrally involved in their definition and application. Nevertheless, service users currently have little impact in defining and influencing quality outcomes. The projects also highlight the importance of networking and knowledge sharing for service users and user organisations in their ability to influence policy definitions of quality, and a number of the barriers and obstacles which undermine this process. The paper concludes with two proposals which, considered together, offer the basis for taking forward effective and inclusive partnerships and developing measures for quality consistent with the rights and preferences of service users themselves. They are an essential complement to broader efforts and strategies to develop effective partnerships in health and social care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16918836     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00654.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  5 in total

1.  Participatory action research to pilot a model of mental health service user involvement in an Ethiopian rural primary healthcare setting: study protocol.

Authors:  Sisay Abayneh; Heidi Lempp; Charlotte Hanlon
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-01-08

2.  A review of organizational arrangements in microfinance and health programs.

Authors:  Jenny Ruducha; Meena Jadhav
Journal:  J Glob Health Rep       Date:  2018-10-01

3.  Parents' experiences of collaboration between welfare professionals regarding children with anxiety or depression - an explorative study.

Authors:  Catharina Widmark; Christer Sandahl; Katarina Piuva; David Bergman
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  What are "good outcomes" for adolescents in public mental health settings?

Authors:  Kristina O Lavik; Marius Veseth; Helga Frøysa; Per-Einar Binder; Christian Moltu
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2018-01-19

5.  How do users with comorbidity perceive participation in social services? A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Amanda Jones; Kari Jess; Ulla-Karin Schön
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2021-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.