Literature DB >> 16918704

Microdialysis for monitoring inflammation: efficient recovery of cytokines and anaphylotoxins provided optimal catheter pore size and fluid velocity conditions.

L Waelgaard1, A Pharo, T I Tønnessen, T E Mollnes.   

Abstract

Microdialysis emerges as a useful tool to evaluate tissue inflammation in a number of clinical conditions, like sepsis and transplant rejection, but systematic methodological studies are missing. This study was undertaken to determine the recovery of relevant inflammatory mediators using the microdialysis system, comparing microdialysis membranes with two different molecular weight cut-offs at different flow rates. Twenty and 100 kDa pore sizes CMA microdialysis catheters were investigated using velocities of 0.3, 1.0 and 5.0 microl/min. Reference preparations for cytokines [tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6 and IL-10; m.w. 17-28 kDa] and chemokines (IL-8, MCP-1, IP-10 and MIG; m.w. 7-11 kDa) were prepared from plasma after incubating human whole blood with lipopolysaccharide. Reference preparation for complement anaphylatoxins (C3a, C4a, C5a; m.w. 9-11 kDa) was prepared by incubating human plasma with heat-aggregated immunoglobulin G. The reference preparations were quantified for the respective inflammatory molecules and used as medium for the microdialysis procedure. Through the 20 kDa filter only the four chemokines passed, but with low recovery (3-7%) and limited to the 1.0 microl/min velocity. The recovery with the 100 kDa filter was as follows: IL-1beta = 75%, MCP-1 = 55%, MIG = 50%, IL-8 = 38%, C4a = 28%, IP-10 = 22%, C5a = 20%, C3a = 16%, IL-6 = 11, IL-10 = 8% and TNF-alpha = 4%. The highest recovery for all chemokines and anaphylatoxins were consistently at velocity 1.0 microl/min, whereas IL-1beta and IL-10 recovered most efficiently at 0.3 microl/min. Thus, microdialysis using catheters with a cut-off of 100 kDa is a reliable method to detect inflammation as judged by a defined panel of inflammatory markers. These findings may have important implications for future clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16918704     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2006.01826.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Immunol        ISSN: 0300-9475            Impact factor:   3.487


  11 in total

Review 1.  Microdialysis for assessing intratumoral drug disposition in brain cancers: a tool for rational drug development.

Authors:  Jaishri Blakeley; Jana Portnow
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 2.  Knowledge gaps in late-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates: a roadmap for future research.

Authors:  Swantje Voller; H Rob Taal; Serife Kurul; Kinga Fiebig; Robert B Flint; Irwin K M Reiss; Helmut Küster; Sinno H P Simons
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Bronchial microdialysis monitoring of inflammatory response in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; an observational study.

Authors:  Stig S Tyvold; Torbjørn Dahl; Stein Dragsund; Sigurd Gunnes; Oddveig Lyng; Jan K Damås; Petter Aadahl; Erik Solligård
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-07

4.  Cytokine and Chemokine Recovery Is Increased by Colloid Perfusates during Dermal Microdialysis.

Authors:  Sven R Quist; Claudia Kirbs; Charlotte Kloft; Harald P Gollnick
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Dextran 500 Improves Recovery of Inflammatory Markers: An In Vitro Microdialysis Study.

Authors:  Susan Giorgi-Coll; Eric Peter Thelin; Caroline Lindblad; Tamara Tajsic; Keri L H Carpenter; Peter J A Hutchinson; Adel Helmy
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Monitoring of the first stages of bone healing with microdialysis.

Authors:  Yvonne Förster; Wenling Gao; Anne Demmrich; Ute Hempel; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  The Skin Reservoir Model: A Tool for Evaluating Microdialysis Sampling of Large Biomarkers from Human Skin.

Authors:  Katrine Baumann; Sidsel Falkencrone; Niels Peter Knudsen; Anders Woetmann; Sally Dabelsteen; Per Stahl Skov
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 8.  Chronic musculoskeletal pain: review of mechanisms and biochemical biomarkers as assessed by the microdialysis technique.

Authors:  Björn Gerdle; Bijar Ghafouri; Malin Ernberg; Britt Larsson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Microdialysis Sampling from Wound Fluids Enables Quantitative Assessment of Cytokines, Proteins, and Metabolites Reveals Bone Defect-Specific Molecular Profiles.

Authors:  Yvonne Förster; Johannes R Schmidt; Dirk K Wissenbach; Susanne E M Pfeiffer; Sven Baumann; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Martin von Bergen; Stefan Kalkhof; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Increased Interstitial Concentrations of Glutamate and Pyruvate in Vastus Lateralis of Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome Are Normalized after an Exercise Intervention - A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Björn Gerdle; Malin Ernberg; Kaisa Mannerkorpi; Britt Larsson; Eva Kosek; Nikolaos Christidis; Bijar Ghafouri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.