Literature DB >> 16917715

Mapping the spatial variability of plant diversity in a tropical forest: comparison of spatial interpolation methods.

J Luis Hernandez-Stefanoni1, Raul Ponce-Hernandez.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the spatial distribution of plant species is essential to conservation and forest managers in order to identify high priority areas such as vulnerable species and habitats, and designate areas for reserves, refuges and other protected areas. A reliable map of the diversity of plant species over the landscape is an invaluable tool for such purposes. In this study, the number of species, the exponent Shannon and the reciprocal Simpson indices, calculated from 141 quadrat sites sampled in a tropical forest were used to compare the performance of several spatial interpolation techniques used to prepare a map of plant diversity, starting from sample (point) data over the landscape. Means of mapped classes, inverse distance functions, kriging and co-kriging, both, applied over the entire studied landscape and also applied within vegetation classes, were the procedures compared. Significant differences in plant diversity indices between classes demonstrated the usefulness of boundaries between vegetation types, mapped through satellite image classification, in stratifying the variability of plant diversity over the landscape. These mapped classes, improved the accuracy of the interpolation methods when they were used as prior information for stratification of the area. Spatial interpolation by co-kriging performed among the poorest interpolators due to the poor correlation between the plant diversity variables and vegetation indices computed by remote sensing and used as covariables. This indicated that the latter are not suitable covariates of plant diversity indices. Finally, a within-class kriging interpolator yielded the most accurate estimates of plant diversity values. This interpolator not only provided the most accurate estimates by accounting for the indices' intra-class variability, but also provided additional useful interpretations of the structure of spatial variability of diversity values through the interpretation of their semi-variograms. This additional role was found very useful in aiding decisions in conservation planning.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917715     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-0885-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Modelling spatial variability using soil profiles in the Riverland of South Australia.

Authors:  P I Brooker
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Predicting species diversity in tropical forests.

Authors:  J B Plotkin; M D Potts; D W Yu; S Bunyavejchewin; R Condit; R Foster; S Hubbell; J LaFrankie; N Manokaran; L H Seng; R Sukumar; M A Nowak; P S Ashton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Heavy metals assessment and identification of their sources in agricultural soils of Southern Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Hani; Ebrahim Pazira
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Estimating impacts of plantation forestry on plant biodiversity in southern Chile-a spatially explicit modelling approach.

Authors:  Andreas Christian Braun; Barbara Koch
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Investigation of landslide detection using radial basis functions: a case study of the Taşkent landslide, Turkey.

Authors:  Mustafa Zeybek; İsmail Şanlıoğlu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Combining geostatistics with Moran's I analysis for mapping soil heavy metals in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Xiao-Ni Huo; Hong Li; Dan-Feng Sun; Lian-Di Zhou; Bao-Guo Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation?

Authors:  Helena Hespanhol; Katia Cezón; Ángel M Felicísimo; Jesús Muñoz; Rubén G Mateo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.