Literature DB >> 16916970

Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants.

Tobias Seidl1, Rüdiger Wehner.   

Abstract

Place defining landmarks that have been studied intensively in insect navigation are large, voluminous objects visible to the insect from quite some distance. Here, we show that in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, local variations in ground properties can also serve as landmarks. The ants were trained to forage within a linear channel, in which the floor adjacent to the nest entrance was altered in optical and tactile properties. When ants were later tested within a test channel that ran parallel to the training channel, they recognized this landmark and centred their search on the part of the ground structure during training that was closest to the nest entrance. Hence, physical properties of the ground can be learnt and used as cues defining, for example, the position of the nest. In a second series of experiments the ants were presented with ground structures that differed in their visual and tactile properties from the training structure. We show that the absence of either the correct tactile properties or the correct optical properties of the ground structure make the ants reject the previously accepted structure. Hence small ground structures are recognized by the ants as familiar landmarks only if both visual and tactile information coincides with what the ants have experienced during training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916970     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

1.  Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching.

Authors:  M T Turvey; Claudia Carello
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Walking on smooth or rough ground: passive control of pretarsal attachment in ants.

Authors:  Thomas Endlein; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Tactile learning by a whip spider, Phrynus marginemaculatus C.L. Koch (Arachnida, Amblypygi).

Authors:  Roger D Santer; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Backtracking behaviour in lost ants: an additional strategy in their navigational toolkit.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Alice Baniel; Ken Cheng
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Michele Lanan
Journal:  Myrmecol News       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.514

6.  Surface structure helps desert ants return to known feeding sites.

Authors:  Tobias Merkle
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

7.  Homing in the wolf spider Lycosa tarantula (Araneae, Lycosidae): the role of active locomotion and visual landmarks.

Authors:  Carmen Reyes-Alcubilla; Miguel A Ruiz; Joaquín Ortega-Escobar
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-12-24

8.  For humans navigating without vision, navigation depends upon the layout of mechanically contacted ground surfaces.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Scott Bonnette; MaryLauren Malone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Desert ants learn vibration and magnetic landmarks.

Authors:  Cornelia Buehlmann; Bill S Hansson; Markus Knaden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A model of ant route navigation driven by scene familiarity.

Authors:  Bart Baddeley; Paul Graham; Philip Husbands; Andrew Philippides
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.