Literature DB >> 16916898

Porcelain surface-conditioning techniques and the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets.

Hakan Türkkahraman1, H Cenker Küçükesmen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of various porcelain surface-conditioning techniques, used either alone or in combination, on the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets cured with a light emitting diode (LED). Thirty glazed porcelain facets were randomly divided into three groups of 10. In group I, the porcelain surfaces were etched with 9.6 per cent hydrofluoric acid (HFA) for 2 minutes before silane application, in group II, the porcelain surfaces were sandblasted with aluminium oxide particles, etched with 9.6 per cent HFA for 2 minutes, and silane applied, and in group III, the porcelain surfaces were sandblasted with aluminium oxide particles before silane application. Spirit ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-cured composite resin (Light Bond) and a LED. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and thermocycled. Bond strength was determined in shear mode at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until fracture occurred. Analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between groups (P < 0.001). The lowest SBS was found in group III (5.46 +/- 1.34, P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between group I (11.38 +/- 1.65) and group II (10.45 +/- 1.15; P > 0.05). Surface treatment with HFA and a silane coupling agent produced the highest bond strength. Sandblasting before HFA and silane application did not significantly increase bond strength. Silane application to sandblasted porcelain provided poor results in vitro and clinical trials are needed to determine its reliability for bonding ceramic brackets to ceramic crowns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916898     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

1.  CO2 laser conditioning of porcelain surfaces for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Mohsen Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gursimrit K Grewal Bach; Ysidora Torrealba; Manuel O Lagravère
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Tensile bond strength of metal bracket bonding to glazed ceramic surfaces with different surface conditionings.

Authors:  Ms Ahmad Akhoundi; M Rahmati Kamel; Sh Mahmood Hashemi; M Imani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-12-20

4.  Resin bonding of metal brackets to glazed zirconia with a porcelain primer.

Authors:  Jung-Hwan Lee; Milim Lee; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Moradinezhad; Mina Moradi; Milad Shamohammadi; Elham Hormozi; Amir Ghorani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 May-Jun

6.  Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets to Porcelain Using a Universal Adhesive.

Authors:  Amin Golshah; Nahid Mohamadi; Farshad Rahimi; Hoda Pouyanfar; Elaheh Seyed Tabaii; Mohammad Moslem Imani
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2018-12

7.  Effects of Novel versus Conventional Porcelain Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Farhad Sobouti; Mehdi Aryana; Sepideh Dadgar; Reza Alizadeh Navaei; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.