OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of compliance and periodic telephone counselling by a pharmacist on mortality in patients receiving polypharmacy. DESIGN: Two year randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital medical clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 502 of 1011 patients receiving five or more drugs for chronic disease found to be non-compliant at the screening visit were invited for randomisation to either the telephone counselling group (n = 219) or control group (n = 223) at enrollment 12-16 weeks later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was all cause mortality in randomised patients. Associations between compliance and mortality in the entire cohort of 1011 patients were also examined. Patients were defined as compliant with a drug if they took 80-120% of the prescribed daily dose. To calculate a compliance score for the whole treatment regimen, the number of drugs that the patient was fully compliant with was divided by the total number of prescribed drugs and expressed as a percentage. Only patients who complied with all recommended drugs were considered compliant (100% score). RESULTS: 60 of the 502 eligible patients defaulted andonly 442 patients were randomised. After two years, 31 (52%) of the defaulters had died, 38 (17%) of the control group had died, and 25 (11%) of the intervention group had died. After adjustment for confounders, telephone counselling was associated with a 41% reduction in the risk of death (relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.97; P = 0.039). The number needed to treat to prevent one death at two years was 16. Other predictors included old age, living alone, rate of admission to hospital, compliance score, number of drugs for chronic disease, and non-treatment with lipid lowering drugs at screening visit. In the cohort of 1011 patients, the adjusted relative risk for death was 1.61 (1.05 to 2.48; P = 0.029) and 2.87 (1.80 to 2.57; P < 0.001) in patients with compliance scores of 34-66% and 0-33%, respectively, compared with those who had a compliance score of 67% or more. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving polypharmacy, poor compliance was associated with increased mortality. Periodic telephone counselling by a pharmacist improved compliance and reduced mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register: SRCTN48076318.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of compliance and periodic telephone counselling by a pharmacist on mortality in patients receiving polypharmacy. DESIGN: Two year randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital medical clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 502 of 1011 patients receiving five or more drugs for chronic disease found to be non-compliant at the screening visit were invited for randomisation to either the telephone counselling group (n = 219) or control group (n = 223) at enrollment 12-16 weeks later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was all cause mortality in randomised patients. Associations between compliance and mortality in the entire cohort of 1011 patients were also examined. Patients were defined as compliant with a drug if they took 80-120% of the prescribed daily dose. To calculate a compliance score for the whole treatment regimen, the number of drugs that the patient was fully compliant with was divided by the total number of prescribed drugs and expressed as a percentage. Only patients who complied with all recommended drugs were considered compliant (100% score). RESULTS: 60 of the 502 eligible patients defaulted and only 442 patients were randomised. After two years, 31 (52%) of the defaulters had died, 38 (17%) of the control group had died, and 25 (11%) of the intervention group had died. After adjustment for confounders, telephone counselling was associated with a 41% reduction in the risk of death (relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.97; P = 0.039). The number needed to treat to prevent one death at two years was 16. Other predictors included old age, living alone, rate of admission to hospital, compliance score, number of drugs for chronic disease, and non-treatment with lipid lowering drugs at screening visit. In the cohort of 1011 patients, the adjusted relative risk for death was 1.61 (1.05 to 2.48; P = 0.029) and 2.87 (1.80 to 2.57; P < 0.001) in patients with compliance scores of 34-66% and 0-33%, respectively, compared with those who had a compliance score of 67% or more. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving polypharmacy, poor compliance was associated with increased mortality. Periodic telephone counselling by a pharmacist improved compliance and reduced mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register: SRCTN48076318.
Authors: Peter Gaede; Pernille Vedel; Nicolai Larsen; Gunnar V H Jensen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Oluf Pedersen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wing Yee So; Peter C Y Tong; Gary T C Ko; Wilson Y S Leung; Chun-Chung Chow; Vincent T F Yeung; Wing-Bun Chan; Julian A J H Critchley; Clive S Cockram; Juliana C N Chan Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Richard H Chapman; Allison A Petrilla; Joshua S Benner; J Sanford Schwartz; Simon S K Tang Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Gary T Ko; Wing-Yee So; Peter C Tong; Francois Le Coguiec; Debborah Kerr; Greg Lyubomirsky; Beaver Tamesis; Troels Wolthers; Jennifer Nan; Juliana Chan Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Derjung M Tarn; Debora A Paterniti; Richard L Kravitz; Stephanie Fein; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: H Sone; S Tanaka; S Iimuro; S Tanaka; K Oida; Y Yamasaki; S Oikawa; S Ishibashi; S Katayama; H Yamashita; H Ito; Y Yoshimura; Y Ohashi; Y Akanuma; N Yamada Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 10.122