Literature DB >> 16916699

High-resolution 3D MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 3 T with the MLEV-PRESS sequence.

Albert P Chen1, Charles H Cunningham, John Kurhanewicz, Duan Xu, Ralph E Hurd, John M Pauly, Lucas Carvajal, Kostas Karpodinis, Daniel B Vigneron.   

Abstract

A 3 T MLEV-point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence employing optimized spectral-spatial and very selective outer-voxel suppression pulses was tested in 25 prostate cancer patients. At an echo time of 85 ms, the MLEV-PRESS sequence resulted in maximally upright inner resonances and minimal outer resonances of the citrate doublet of doublets. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) exams performed at both 3 and 1.5 T for 10 patients demonstrated a 2.08+/-0.36-fold increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 3 T as compared with 1.5 T for the center citrate resonances. This permitted the acquisition of MRSI data with a nominal spatial resolution of 0.16 cm3 at 3 T with similar SNR as the 0.34-cm3 data acquired at 1.5 T. Due to the twofold increase in spectral resolution at 3 T and the improved magnetic field homogeneity provided by susceptibility-matched endorectal coils, the choline resonance was better resolved from polyamine and creatine resonances as compared with 1.5 T spectra. In prostate cancer patients, the elevation of choline and the reduction of polyamines were more clearly observed at 3 T, as compared with 1.5 T MRSI. The increased SNR and corresponding spatial resolution obtainable at 3 T reduced partial volume effects and allowed improved detection of the presence and extent of abnormal metabolite levels in prostate cancer patients, as compared with 1.5 T MRSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916699     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  18 in total

1.  Investigation of the PSF-choice method for reduced lipid contamination in prostate MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Lawrence P Panych; Joseph R Roebuck; Nan-kuei Chen; Yi Tang; Bruno Madore; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Multiparametric 3T endorectal mri after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Galen D Reed; Phillip P Vinh; Christopher Sotto; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging before and after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; David A McKenna; John Kurhanewicz; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  In vivo 1D and 2D correlation MR spectroscopy of the soleus muscle at 7T.

Authors:  Saadallah Ramadan; Eva-Maria Ratai; Lawrence L Wald; Carolyn E Mountford
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Post-processing correction of the endorectal coil reception effects in MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  Susan M Noworolski; Galen D Reed; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

7.  The aging effect on prostate metabolite concentrations measured by 1H MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Monika Dezortova; Filip Jiru; Antonin Skoch; Vaclav Capek; Zuzana Ryznarova; Viktor Vik; Milan Hajek
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Advances in MR spectroscopy of the prostate.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Abnormal findings on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging predict subsequent biopsy upgrade in patients with low risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Robert R Flavell; Antonio C Westphalen; Carmin Liang; Christopher C Sotto; Susan M Noworolski; Daniel B Vigneron; Zhen J Wang; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-10

Review 10.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.