Literature DB >> 16916432

Responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) in single versus grouped participants.

Emma Childs1, Lisa Marie Vicini, Harriet De Wit.   

Abstract

Psychological stress plays an important role in psychopathologies. Laboratory methods have been designed to study stress responses in health and disease. The Trier Social Stress Test is a procedure designed to induce psychosocial stress, but the method is costly in terms of time and personnel requirements. We investigated whether conducting the task with multiple participants influenced cortisol, heart rate, and subjective responses and improved efficiency. Healthy male and female volunteers (N = 32) performed the task individually or in groups. Salivary cortisol, anxiety, and jitteriness increased and calmness decreased similarly in both conditions. Grouped participants exhibited greater peak increases in heart rate than those who performed individually. The findings suggest that the TSST may be conducted with multiple participants without significantly affecting subjective and cortisol responses to the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916432     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00414.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  15 in total

1.  The relation between electroencephalogram asymmetry and attention biases to threat at baseline and under stress.

Authors:  Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Autumn Kujawa; S Katherine Nelson; Claire Cole; Daniel J Zapp
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  An inactive control of the 'Trier Social Stress Test' for Youth 10-17 years: Neuroendocrine, cardiac, and subjective responses.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Tammi-Marie Phillip; Victoria Doretto; Stefon van Noordt; Tara M Chaplin; Rebecca E Hommer; Linda C Mayes; Michael J Crowley
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.905

3.  Cortisol responses to a group public speaking task for adolescents: variations by age, gender, and race.

Authors:  Camelia E Hostinar; Mollie T McQuillan; Heather J Mirous; Kathryn E Grant; Emma K Adam
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Psychological reactivity to laboratory stress is associated with hormonal responses in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Carolyn Y Fang; Brian L Egleston; Angelica M Manzur; Raymond R Townsend; Frank Z Stanczyk; David Spiegel; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Internalized weight bias and cortisol reactivity to social stress.

Authors:  F U Jung; Y J Bae; J Kratzsch; S G Riedel-Heller; C Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The role of stress in absenteeism: cortisol responsiveness among patients on long-term sick leave.

Authors:  Henrik B Jacobsen; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard; Karen W Hara; Petter C Borchgrevink; Astrid Woodhouse; Nils Inge Landrø; Anette Harris; Tore C Stiles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.

Authors:  Grace E Giles; Caroline R Mahoney; Tad T Brunyé; Holly A Taylor; Robin B Kanarek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neighborhood disadvantage and adolescent stress reactivity.

Authors:  Daniel A Hackman; Laura M Betancourt; Nancy L Brodsky; Hallam Hurt; Martha J Farah
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Selective impact of early parental responsivity on adolescent stress reactivity.

Authors:  Daniel A Hackman; Laura M Betancourt; Nancy L Brodsky; Lara Kobrin; Hallam Hurt; Martha J Farah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Youth in the Netherlands study (JOiN): study design.

Authors:  Anja C Huizink; Kirstin Greaves-Lord; Brittany E Evans; Anja S Euser; Jan van der Ende; Frank C Verhulst; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.