Literature DB >> 16916387

Outcome after pancreatic necrosectomy: trends over 12 years at an Indian centre.

Mettus Reddy1, Ravul Jindal, Rajesh Gupta, Thakur D Yadav, Jai Dev Wig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis is a formidable operation. There are limited data from the Indian subcontinent regarding outcome and recent trends in management.
METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic necrosectomy over a 12-year period were identified from a prospective database. Data regarding the hospital course, complications and outcome were extracted by case file review. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. An attempt was made to identify trends in management and outcome over the study period.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients underwent necrosectomy. The median age was 39.5 years (interquartile range, 32-46). Median Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II score at admission was 8 (interquartile range, 6-10). Thirty-nine patients (33%) had organ failure at admission. Patients underwent surgery a median of 23 days (interquartile range, 14-34) after onset of illness. There was high incidence of loco-regional complications (68/118, 58%) and organ failure (88/118, 75%) in the postoperative period. The mortality rate was 38%. There was an increase in the median onset to surgery interval (17 vs 25.5 days; P = 0.001), increased use of percutaneous interventions (20 vs 36%; P = 0.05) and decreased mortality (47 vs 29%; P = 0.052) in the later half of the study period.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic necrosectomy continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in India. A trend towards increased use of percutaneous interventions and delayed surgery is evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916387     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03835.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  8 in total

1.  Routine use of U-tube drainage for necrotizing pancreatitis: a step toward less morbidity and resource utilization.

Authors:  Christopher C Stahl; Jonathan Moulton; Doan Vu; Ross Ristagno; Kyuran Choe; Jeffrey J Sussman; Shimul A Shah; Syed A Ahmad; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  [Pancreatic necrosis: pro surgical therapy].

Authors:  J Werner; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Analysis of the delayed approach to the management of infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Nilesh Doctor; Sujith Philip; Vidhyachandra Gandhi; Maharra Hussain; Savio G Barreto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Is necrosectomy obsolete for infected necrotizing pancreatitis? Is a paradigm shift needed?

Authors:  Yu-Chung Chang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Five-year cohort study of open pancreatic necrosectomy for necotizing pancreatitis suggests it is a safe and effective operation.

Authors:  Shanmiao Gou; Jiongxin Xiong; Heshui Wu; Feng Zhou; Jing Tao; Tao Liu; Chunyou Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Surgical and interventional management of complications caused by acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Feza Y Karakayali
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Acute Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Real-World Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India.

Authors:  Satwant Singh; Siddharth Prakash; Deepak Kaushal; Honey Chahal; Ajit Sood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-14

8.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Marek Wroński; Włodzimierz Cebulski; Dominika Karkocha; Maciej Słodkowski; Lukasz Wysocki; Mieczysław Jankowski; Ireneusz W Krasnodębski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.