Literature DB >> 16916303

Acceptability of maxillary major connectors in removable partial dentures.

Abiodun Olabisi Arigbede1, Oluwole O Dosumu, Temitope Ayodeji Esan, Patricia A Akeredolu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of connector lies between plate, a bar or a combination of bars, which may cross the palate in various positions. Many opinions have been expressed concerning the acceptability to the patients of the various forms of palatal connectors but there have been few investigations.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare subjective patients' reactions to three maxillary major connectors: metal bar, metal plate, and acrylic connectors and to establish the most acceptable and the least acceptable maxillary major connectors.
METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients attending the prosthetic out-patient clinic of Dental Center, University College Hospital, Ibadan who had never worn dentures were recruited into the study. Three dentures each with a different maxillary major connector design were fabricated for each patient. A questionnaire was administered to ascertain their reactions to each of the three denture designs.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients (93.3%) preferred the denture with metal palatal bar major connector whereas only one patient preferred the denture with acrylic plate major connector design. No patient preferred the palatal metal plate connector design.
CONCLUSIONS: The metal bar major connector was the most acceptable maxillary major connector while acrylic resin plate was more acceptable than metal plate maxillary major connector. It also confirmed the influence of connector design on patient acceptance of removable partial denture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916303      PMCID: PMC1831977          DOI: 10.5555/afhs.2006.6.2.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  10 in total

1.  Connectors.

Authors:  J C Davenport; R M Basker; J R Heath; J P Ralph; P O Glantz; P Hammond
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-02-24       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers. 1964.

Authors:  Krishan K Kapur; Sham D Soman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Subjective reactions to major connector designs for removable partial dentures.

Authors:  L D Campbell
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Variability in dentists' designs of a removable maxillary partial denture.

Authors:  W R Frantz
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Dynamic palatography--a study of linguopalatal contacts during the production of selected consonant sounds.

Authors:  W T Harley
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Partial denture tolerance.

Authors:  J Farrell
Journal:  Dent Pract Dent Rec       Date:  1969-01

7.  Variations in a removable maxillary partial denture design by dentists.

Authors:  W R Frantz
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Partial denture technique. 5.--Connectors.

Authors:  J D Walter
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1980-03-04       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Comparison of major connectors for removable partial dentures.

Authors:  A G Wagner; F C Traweek
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  The influence of denture design on patient acceptance of partial dentures.

Authors:  N J Jepson; J M Thomason; J G Steele
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1995-04-22       Impact factor: 1.626

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  African Health Sciences. Editor's choice.

Authors:  James K Tumwine
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.