Literature DB >> 16916012

[Process indicators and standards for the evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes].

Livia Giordano1, Daniela Giorgi, Alfonso Frigerio, Patrizia Bravetti, Eugenio Paci, Marco Petrella, Antonio Ponti, Priscilla Sassoli de' Bianchi.   

Abstract

In order to obtain the maximum benefit from breast cancer screening it is essential for every programme to reach high levels of sensitivity and specificity. This can only be achieved if skill and a comprehensive quality assurance system is applied to the entire process, involving each individual part of the programme. Monitoring of outcomes and continuous evaluation of the entire screening process are key operational objectives for a successful population screening programme. The aim of this document, born in the framework of the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa), is to propose a unique methodology for collecting and reporting screening data using commonly agreed terminology, definitions and classifications. The indicators considered are those referred to the entire screening process and its sequelae, such as organizational, logistic and performance indicators. The indicators are provided under form of a synthetic and easy to use card. Every card is structured in short sections: definition, aim of the indicator, the data necessary to build it, the summarizing formula, possible problems of interpretation, the acceptable and desirable standards (derived both from the experience of national and European breast cancer screening programmes).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Prev        ISSN: 1120-9763            Impact factor:   1.901


  5 in total

1.  Incidence, detection, and tumour stage of breast cancer in a cohort of Italian women with negative screening mammography report recommending early (short-interval) rescreen.

Authors:  Alessandra Ravaioli; Flavia Foca; Americo Colamartini; Fabio Falcini; Carlo Naldoni; Alba C Finarelli; Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi; Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Should breast cancer survivors be excluded from, or invited to, organised mammography screening programmes?

Authors:  Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa).

Authors:  Daniela Bernardi; Paolo Belli; Eva Benelli; Beniamino Brancato; Lauro Bucchi; Massimo Calabrese; Luca A Carbonaro; Francesca Caumo; Beatrice Cavallo-Marincola; Paola Clauser; Chiara Fedato; Alfonso Frigerio; Vania Galli; Livia Giordano; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Paola Golinelli; Doralba Morrone; Giovanna Mariscotti; Laura Martincich; Stefania Montemezzi; Carlo Naldoni; Adriana Paduos; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Fiammetta Querci; Antonio Rizzo; Gianni Saguatti; Alberto Tagliafico; Rubina M Trimboli; Marco Zappa; Chiara Zuiani; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Development and first application of an audit system for screening programs based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model: an experience with breast cancer screening in the region of Lombardy (Italy).

Authors:  Danilo Cereda; Antonio Federici; Angela Guarino; Grazia Serantoni; Liliana Coppola; Patrizia Lemma; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction.

Authors:  D Puliti; G Miccinesi; N Collina; V De Lisi; M Federico; S Ferretti; A C Finarelli; F Foca; L Mangone; C Naldoni; M Petrella; A Ponti; N Segnan; A Sigona; M Zarcone; M Zorzi; M Zappa; E Paci
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.