Literature DB >> 16915111

A paradigm for inpatient resuscitation research with an exception from informed consent.

Marilyn C Morris1, Ruth L Fischbach, Robert M Nelson, Charles L Schleien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Resuscitation research with an exception from informed consent (EFIC) has not been reported in the inpatient or pediatric setting, and little practical information exists to guide application of EFIC regulations to inpatient or pediatric research. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting inpatient pediatric resuscitation research with EFIC using handouts to communicate with parents of potential participants and to determine how many parents would likely allow their child to participate in such research.
DESIGN: Verbal questionnaire.
SETTING: Pediatric intensive care units. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of pediatric intensive care unit patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Three one-page handouts described proposed studies; version 1 described a trial of a new medication given during cardiac arrest, and versions 2a and 2b described of a trial of induced hypothermia, with version 2a in paragraph format and version 2b in bullet format. We asked parents of pediatric intensive care unit patients to review the handouts, and then we administered a verbal questionnaire to assess parental reactions to the handouts and to determine how many parents would allow their child to participate.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One or both parents of 91 patients were asked to participate; 100% agreed. Sixty-three percent said they would likely allow their child to participate in resuscitation research with EFIC if they were given a prospective opportunity to opt out. Parents who reviewed version 2b (bullet format) were more likely than parents who reviewed version 2a (paragraph format) to say that they would let their child participate. Parents were more supportive of a trial of induced hypothermia than of a trial of a new medication given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Parents endorsed conducting the community consultation process for inpatient resuscitation research with families and healthcare providers of critically ill patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient pediatric resuscitation research is feasible using handouts to inform parents of a study and provide a prospective opportunity to opt out. Succinct, bullet-format handouts will yield higher participation rates than paragraph-format handouts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16915111     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239115.76603.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  8 in total

1.  Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered "Exception from Informed Consent" trial.

Authors:  Maija Holsti; Roger Zemek; Jill Baren; Rachel M Stanley; Prashant Mahajan; Cheryl Vance; Kathleen M Brown; Victor Gonzalez; Denise King; Kammy Jacobsen; Kate Shreve; Katrina van de Bruinhorst; Anne Marie Jones; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Factors affecting consent in pediatric critical care research.

Authors:  Kusum Menon; Roxanne E Ward; Isabelle Gaboury; Margot Thomas; Ari Joffe; Karen Burns; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Reasons for nonenrollment in a clinical trial of acute lung injury.

Authors:  Andrea E Glassberg; John M Luce; Michael A Matthay
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Parental permission and child assent in research on children.

Authors:  Michelle Roth-Cline; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-09-20

5.  Informed consent in paediatric critical care research--a South African perspective.

Authors:  Brenda M Morrow; Andrew C Argent; Sharon Kling
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 6.  Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.

Authors:  Nina H Gobat; Micaela Gal; Nick A Francis; Kerenza Hood; Angela Watkins; Jill Turner; Ronald Moore; Steve A R Webb; Christopher C Butler; Alistair Nichol
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Melissa J Parker; Sonya de Laat; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Patient and surrogate attitudes via an interviewer-administered survey on exception from informed consent enrollment in the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial.

Authors:  Insiyah Campwala; Francis X Guyette; Joshua B Brown; Peter W Adams; Barbara J Early; Mark H Yazer; Matthew D Neal; Brian S Zuckerbraun; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.