Literature DB >> 16914612

Simple models show the general advantages of dendrites in coincidence detection.

Vasant K Dasika1, John A White, H Steven Colburn.   

Abstract

Dendrites can influence and improve information processing in single neurons. Here, simple models are used to elucidate mechanisms underlying the dendritic enhancement of coincidence detection. We focus on coincidence-detecting cells in the auditory system, which have bipolar dendrites and show acute sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD), a critical cue for spatial hearing. A three-compartment model consisting of a single-compartment soma and two single-compartment dendrites is primarily used, although multiple-compartment dendrites are also tested. Two varieties of somata, with and without active ion channels, are studied. Using constant conductance inputs, we show analytically that the somatic response to balanced bilateral inputs is largest, whereas the response monotonically decreases as the input distribution becomes increasingly monolateral. This enhancement is a consequence of the sublinear saturating dendritic voltage response to conductance input and occurs when dendrites are composed of a single compartment or either a finite number or an infinite number (i.e., a cable) of compartments. Longer, thinner dendrites or greater numbers of compartments increase the enhancement of the somatic response to bilateral input. The time-independent dendritic enhancement, moreover, underlies improved coincidence detection of time-varying input. Coincidence sensitivity to a pair of conductance pulses and rate-ITD modulation to low-frequency (400-Hz) periodic inputs increases with dendritic length. These findings are related to the length gradient in the avian system, where low characteristic frequency (CF) cells have long dendrites and high CF cells have short dendrites. We conclude that dendrites fundamentally improve coincidence detection, increasing the computational power of many neurons in the nervous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16914612     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00669.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Control of a depolarizing GABAergic input in an auditory coincidence detection circuit.

Authors:  Zheng-Quan Tang; Hongxiang Gao; Yong Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Control of submillisecond synaptic timing in binaural coincidence detectors by K(v)1 channels.

Authors:  Paul J Mathews; Pablo E Jercog; John Rinzel; Luisa L Scott; Nace L Golding
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Out of balance: how a binaural coincidence detection circuit responds to unilateral deafferentation.

Authors:  Michael T Roberts
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Activity-dependent synaptic integration and modulation of bilateral excitatory inputs in an auditory coincidence detection circuit.

Authors:  Yong Lu; Yuwei Liu; Rebecca J Curry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Astrocyte-secreted factors modulate the developmental distribution of inhibitory synapses in nucleus laminaris of the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Matthew J Korn; Scott J Koppel; Lan H Li; Divya Mehta; Sonia B Mehta; Armin H Seidl; Karina S Cramer
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Regulation of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission in the chick nucleus laminaris: role of N-type calcium channels.

Authors:  Y Lu
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Soma-axon coupling configurations that enhance neuronal coincidence detection.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Michiel W H Remme; John Rinzel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Function and energy consumption constrain neuronal biophysics in a canonical computation: Coincidence detection.

Authors:  Michiel W H Remme; John Rinzel; Susanne Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Coincidence detection in the medial superior olive: mechanistic implications of an analysis of input spiking patterns.

Authors:  Tom P Franken; Peter Bremen; Philip X Joris
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.