OBJECTIVES: To validate the Probability of Repeated Admission (Pra) questionnaire, a widely used self-administered tool for predicting future healthcare use in older persons, in three European healthcare systems. DESIGN: Prospective study with 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Hamburg, Germany; London, United Kingdom; Canton of Solothurn, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Nine thousand seven hundred thirteen independently living community-dwelling people aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Self-administered eight-item Pra questionnaire at baseline. Self-reported number of hospital admissions and physician visits during 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: In the combined sample, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.62-0.66) for the prediction of one or more hospital admissions and 0.68 (95% CI=0.66-0.69) for the prediction of more than six physician visits during the following year. AUCs were similar between sites. In comparison, prediction models based on a person's age and sex alone exhibited poor predictive validity (AUC <or= 0.57). High-risk individuals (Pra score >or= 0.5) were 2.3 times as likely (95% CI=2.1-2.6) as low-risk individuals to have a hospital admission, and 2.1 times as likely (95% CI=2.0-2.2) to have more than six physician visits. CONCLUSION: The Pra instrument exhibits good validity for predicting future health service use on a population level in different healthcare settings. Administrative data have shown similar predictive validity, but in practice, such data are often not available. The Pra is likely of high interest to governments and health insurance companies worldwide as a basis for programs aimed at health risk management in older persons.
OBJECTIVES: To validate the Probability of Repeated Admission (Pra) questionnaire, a widely used self-administered tool for predicting future healthcare use in older persons, in three European healthcare systems. DESIGN: Prospective study with 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Hamburg, Germany; London, United Kingdom; Canton of Solothurn, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Nine thousand seven hundred thirteen independently living community-dwelling people aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Self-administered eight-item Pra questionnaire at baseline. Self-reported number of hospital admissions and physician visits during 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: In the combined sample, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.62-0.66) for the prediction of one or more hospital admissions and 0.68 (95% CI=0.66-0.69) for the prediction of more than six physician visits during the following year. AUCs were similar between sites. In comparison, prediction models based on a person's age and sex alone exhibited poor predictive validity (AUC <or= 0.57). High-risk individuals (Pra score >or= 0.5) were 2.3 times as likely (95% CI=2.1-2.6) as low-risk individuals to have a hospital admission, and 2.1 times as likely (95% CI=2.0-2.2) to have more than six physician visits. CONCLUSION: The Pra instrument exhibits good validity for predicting future health service use on a population level in different healthcare settings. Administrative data have shown similar predictive validity, but in practice, such data are often not available. The Pra is likely of high interest to governments and health insurance companies worldwide as a basis for programs aimed at health risk management in older persons.
Authors: Michael A LaMantia; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Kevin Biese; Christine Khandelwal; Cory Forbach; Charles B Cairns; Jan Busby-Whitehead; John S Kizer Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Anupam Chandra; Sarah J Crane; Ericka E Tung; Gregory J Hanson; Frederick North; Stephen S Cha; Paul Y Takahashi Journal: Aging Dis Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 6.745
Authors: Giampiero Mazzaglia; Lorenzo Roti; Giacomo Corsini; Angela Colombini; Gavino Maciocco; Niccolò Marchionni; Eva Buiatti; Luigi Ferrucci; Mauro Di Bari Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Varun Puri; Aalok P Patel; Traves D Crabtree; Jennifer M Bell; Stephen R Broderick; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Ulrike Dapp; Jennifer Anders; Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse; Stefan Golgert; Hans Peter Meier-Baumgartner; Christoph E Minder Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Sarah J Crane; Ericka E Tung; Gregory J Hanson; Stephen Cha; Rajeev Chaudhry; Paul Y Takahashi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Sharon K Inouye; Ying Zhang; Richard N Jones; Peilin Shi; L Adrienne Cupples; Harold N Calderon; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.983