Literature DB >> 16913863

Predicting leaf-level fluxes of O3 and NO2: the relative roles of diffusion and biochemical processes.

Allyson S D Eller1, Jed P Sparks.   

Abstract

Pollutants like O(3) and NO(2) enter leaves through the stomata and cause damage during reactions with components of biological cell membranes. The steady-state flux rates of these gases into the leaf are determined by a series of physical and biochemical resistances including stomatal aperture, reactions occurring within the cell wall and the ability of the leaf to remove the products of apoplastic reactions. In the present study, multiple regression models incorporating stomatal conductance, apoplastic and symplastic ascorbate concentrations, and nitrate reductase (NR) activities were generated to explain the observed variations in leaf-level flux rates of O(3) and NO(2). These measurements were made on the plant Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle). The best-fit model explaining NO(2) flux included stomatal conductance, apoplastic ascorbate and NR activity. This model explained 89% of the variation in observed leaf fluxes and suggested physical resistances, reaction between NO(2) and apoplastic ascorbate, and the removal rate of nitrate (generated by reactions of NO(2) and water) from the apoplast all play controlling roles in NO(2) flux to leaves. O(3) flux was best explained by stomatal conductance and symplastic ascorbate explaining 66% of the total variation in leaf flux. Both models demonstrate the importance of measuring processes other than stomatal conductance to explain steady-state leaf-level fluxes of pollutant gases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16913863     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01546.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  7 in total

1.  Dry Deposition of Ozone over Land: Processes, Measurement, and Modeling.

Authors:  Olivia E Clifton; Arlene M Fiore; William J Massman; Colleen B Baublitz; Mhairi Coyle; Lisa Emberson; Silvano Fares; Delphine K Farmer; Pierre Gentine; Giacomo Gerosa; Alex B Guenther; Detlev Helmig; Danica L Lombardozzi; J William Munger; Edward G Patton; Sally E Pusede; Donna B Schwede; Sam J Silva; Matthias Sörgel; Allison L Steiner; Amos P K Tai
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 22.000

2.  Is ozone flux inside leaves only a damage indicator? Clues from volatile isoprenoid studies.

Authors:  Francesco Loreto; Silvano Fares
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Leaf nitrogen dioxide uptake coupling apoplastic chemistry, carbon/sulfur assimilation, and plant nitrogen status.

Authors:  Yanbo Hu; Guangyu Sun
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 4.  Ecological ramifications of the direct foliar uptake of nitrogen.

Authors:  Jed P Sparks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Ozone risk for crops and pastures in present and future climates.

Authors:  Jürg Fuhrer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-11-20

6.  Metabolites of 2,3-diketogulonate delay peroxidase action and induce non-enzymic H2O2 generation: Potential roles in the plant cell wall.

Authors:  Anna Kärkönen; Rebecca A Dewhirst; C Logan Mackay; Stephen C Fry
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  A comparative analysis of transcriptomic, biochemical, and physiological responses to elevated ozone identifies species-specific mechanisms of resilience in legume crops.

Authors:  Craig R Yendrek; Robert P Koester; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 6.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.