Literature DB >> 16913309

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: early experience and outcomes.

Christopher K Senkowski1, Micheal T Adams, Angela N Beck, Steven T Brower.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophageal surgery has the potential to improve mortality, hospital stay, and functional outcomes when compared with open methods. Although technically complex, combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageal resection is feasible. A case series of 20 patients who underwent minimally invasive total esophagectomy is presented. This study was a review of a prospective database. The purpose was to evaluate early results with laparoscopic total esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease. Between January 2003 and November 2005, 20 patients underwent minimally invasive esophageal surgery. All operations were performed by the same two surgeons. Age, gender, indications for surgery, pathologic stage, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and mortality were recorded. Diet progression, dysphagia, and need for stricture management were also recorded. Of the 20 minimally invasive total esophagectomies performed, 18 (90%) were completed successfully. The average age of the patients was 53 years. Indications for surgery were malignancy (n = 13), carcinoma in situ in the setting of Barrett's esophagus (n = 2), and benign stricture (n = 3). The average operating time was 467 minutes (range 346-580 min). Median blood loss was 350 mL (range 150-500 mL). The median intensive care unit stay was 2 days, and the median hospital length of stay was 12 days. Pathology revealed that 7 per cent of patients had stage I disease, 27 per cent of patients had stage II disease, and 53 per cent of patients had stage III disease. There was a single mortality (5%), a cervical leak in two patients (10%), a gastric tip necrosis in one patient (5%), and tracheoesophageal fistula in one patient (5%). Major complications occurred in eight patients (40%) and minor complications in nine (50%). Thirteen (72%) patients were discharged on enteral tube feeds to supplement caloric intake. The application of minimally invasive techniques in the arena of esophageal surgery continues to evolve. This approach has the potential to improve mortality, hospital stay, and other outcomes when compared with open methods. Although technically complex, laparoscopic total esophagectomy is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16913309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  The first randomised controlled trial on minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and the ongoing quest for greater evidence.

Authors:  Marc M Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.

Authors:  Jang-Ming Lee; Shang-Chi Chen; Shun-Mao Yang; Ying-Fan Tseng; Pei-Wen Yang; Pei-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study.

Authors:  Sebastian F Schoppmann; Gerhard Prager; Felix B Langer; Franz M Riegler; Barbara Kabon; Edith Fleischmann; Johannes Zacherl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jang-Ming Lee; Jen-Wei Cheng; Ming-Tsang Lin; Pei-Ming Huang; Jin-Shing Chen; Yung-Chie Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Multimedia article: endoscopically guided thoracoscopic esophagectomy for stricture in a child.

Authors:  Marcus M Malek; Sohail R Shah; Aviva L Katz; Timothy D Kane
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic-assisted single-incision gastric mobilization for minimally invasive oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Yu-Han Huang; Ke-Cheng Chen; Sian-Han Lin; Pei-Ming Huang; Pei-Wen Yang; Jang-Ming Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Modified McKeown procedure with uniportal thoracoscope for upper or middle esophageal cancer: initial experience and preliminary results.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Wei Ping; Yixin Cai; Shengling Fu; Xiangning Fu; Ni Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Semi-Prone Position (Pawar Technique): Technical Aspects and Outcome in 224 Patients.

Authors:  Suraj B Pawar; Kiran G Bagul; Yogesh S Anap; Prasad K Tanawade; Ashwini Mane; Snehdeep S Patil; Reshma S Pawar; Shubham S Kulkarni; Aditya S Pawar
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.