Literature DB >> 16912709

Central venous catheter outcomes in nocturnal hemodialysis.

J Perl1, C E Lok, C T Chan.   

Abstract

Central venous catheter (CVC) as hemodialysis (HD) access is associated with great morbidity and mortality in the end-stage renal disease population. Quotidian, nocturnal HD (NHD) is a novel dialysis modality associated with cardiovascular and quality of life benefits, yet there is a concern of a potential increase in vascular access-related complications through patient-directed access cannulation. We aimed to determine catheter incidence and prevalence in the NHD population and to compare rates of catheter-related: infection, thrombolytic administration, hospitalization, survival, and reasons for their loss before and after conversion to NHD. This observational cohort consisted of incident and prevalent NHD patients between 1 November 1993 and 31 May 2005. Rate comparisons were determined by Poisson analysis and catheter survival by Kaplan-Meier curves. Eighty-one CVCs in 33 patients accounted for 17 150 CVC days (CVCD); 40 CVCs were exclusively used for conventional three times weekly HD (CHD) and 25 CVCs were exclusively used during NHD. The incidence and prevalence of CVC use in our NHD population was 35 and 25%, respectively. Comparing CHD to NHD, no significant differences were seen in total rates of infection, thrombolytic administration, or access-related hospitalization. Catheter survival was superior in NHD vs CHD (P=0.03). Adverse terminal catheter events were higher during CHD than NHD (5.84 vs 2.92/1000 CVCD; P=0.03). CVC use and complications in NHD is comparable to that in CHD with the benefit of longer cumulative survival. More frequent CVC use should not be a deterrent to NHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16912709     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  4 in total

1.  Association of Vascular Access Type with Mortality, Hospitalization, and Transfer to In-Center Hemodialysis in Patients Undergoing Home Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Matthew B Rivara; Melissa Soohoo; Elani Streja; Miklos Z Molnar; Connie M Rhee; Alfred K Cheung; Ronit Katz; Onyebuchi A Arah; Allen R Nissenson; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Financial implications to Medicare from changing the dialysis modality mix under the bundled prospective payment system.

Authors:  Frank X Liu; Surrey M Walton; Robert Leipold; Deborah Isbell; Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Intensified hemodialysis regimens: neglected treatment options for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Miriam Zimmering; Christopher T Chan; Philip A McFarlane; Andreas Pierratos; Uwe Querfeld
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Home haemodialysis.

Authors:  Daljit K Hothi; Lynsey Stronach; Elizabeth Harvey
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.714

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.