Literature DB >> 16912697

Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.

Maosheng Yao1, Gediminas Mainelis.   

Abstract

Portable microbial samplers are being increasingly used to determine the presence of microbial agents in the air; however, their performance characteristics when sampling airborne biological agents are largely unknown. In addition, it is unknown whether these samplers could be used to assess microbial inhalation exposure according to the particle sampling conventions. This research analyzed collection efficiencies of MAS-100, Microflow, SMA MicroPortable, Millipore Air Tester, SAS Super 180, BioCulture, and RCS High Flow portable microbial samplers when sampling six bacterial and fungal species ranging from 0.61 to 3.14 microm in aerodynamic diameter. The efficiencies with which airborne microorganisms were deposited on samplers' collection medium were compared to the particle inhalation and lung deposition convention curves. When sampling fungi, RCS High Flow and SAS Super 180 deposited 80%-90% of airborne spores on agar - highest among investigated samplers. Other samplers showed collection efficiencies of 10%-60%. When collecting bacteria, RCS High Flow and MAS-100 collected 20%-30%, whereas other samplers collected less than 10% of these bioparticles. Comparison of samplers' collection efficiencies with particle inhalation convention curves showed that RCS High Flow and SAS Super 180 could be used to assess inhalation exposure to particles larger than 2.5 microm, such as fungal spores. Performance of RCS High Flow sampler was also reflective of the particle lung deposition pattern when sampling both bacteria and fungi. MAS-100 and SAS Super 180 matched the total deposition curve fairly well when collecting bacterial and fungi species, respectively. For other tested samplers, we observed substantial discrepancies between their performances and particle deposition efficiencies in the lung. The results show that feasibility of applying portable microbial samplers for exposure assessment depends on a particular sampler model and microbial species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16912697     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  5 in total

1.  Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.809

2.  Immunohistochemical study on the distribution of β-defensin 1 and β-defensin 2 throughout the respiratory tract of healthy rats.

Authors:  Natsumi Masuda; Youhei Mantani; Hideto Yuasa; Chiaki Yoshitomi; Masaya Arai; Miho Nishida; Wang-Mei Qi; Junichi Kawano; Toshifumi Yokoyama; Nobuhiko Hoshi; Hiroshi Kitagawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Investigation of Removal Capacities of Biofilters for Airborne Viable Micro-Organisms.

Authors:  Rémi Soret; Jean-Louis Fanlo; Luc Malhautier; Philippe Geiger; Sandrine Bayle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Enhancing bioaerosol sampling by Andersen impactors using mineral-oil-spread agar plate.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Xu; Kai Wei; Yan Wu; Fangxia Shen; Qi Chen; Mingzhen Li; Maosheng Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A high-flow portable biological aerosol trap (HighBioTrap) for rapid microbial detection.

Authors:  Haoxuan Chen; Maosheng Yao
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.433

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.